ArticleFolia microbiologica2015
Expression of CD64 on neutrophils can be used to predict the severity of bloodstream infection before broad range 16S rRNA PCR.
Article in Folia microbiologica, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Utility of Neutrophil CD64 and Presepsin as Diagnostic, Prognostic, and Monitoring Biomarkers in Neonatal Sepsis.International journal of microbiology · 2020Article
- Expression of CD11c and EMR2 on neutrophils: potential diagnostic biomarkers for sepsis and systemic inflammation.Clinical and experimental immunology · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aging population and increased incidence of severe bacterial infection can lead to sepsis. Interest to early identification of endangered patients and identification of pathogen do not always confirm the infection. To use biomarkers can help in early identification of infection and opportunity to start therapy timeously. All biomarkers were defined in 33 out of 96 patients. Thirty-two (97 %) patients had bacterial infection and 1 (3 %) patient had systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) without infection. PCR confirmed the infection in 27 cases and blood cultures in 8. Area under curve (AUC) for CD64 was 1.00, meanwhile other biomarkers showed 2-fold smaller AUC for positive infection. CD64 index was associated with bacterial infection (p<0.001) and could be used to confirm assessment of SIRS severity (p=0.037). As regards to our results, limited to only 33 patients, CD64 index served as a good parameter to predict bacterial infection and determine severity. The use of broad range 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) PCR proved to be an excellent tool to confirm bloodstream infection. The CD64 index had the highest AUC, which exceeded all the others, and could be used to predict the outcome of broad range 16S rRNA PCR from whole blood. However, C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT) and sCD14 are much easier and faster to measure, but the values could be elevated in other clinical assessments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25253263What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.