ArticleBMC bioinformatics2014
A better sequence-read simulator program for metagenomics.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed.
- RAmpSim: a thermodynamic simulator for hybridization capture in metagenomic sequencing.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- RAmpSim: A Thermodynamic Simulator for Hybridization Capture in Metagenomic Sequencing.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Semisynthetic simulation for microbiome data analysis.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Review
- Simulated High Throughput Sequencing Datasets: A Crucial Tool for Validating Bioinformatic Pathogen Detection Pipelines.Biology · 2024Article
- SWAMPy: simulating SARS-CoV-2 wastewater amplicon metagenomes.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- Boquila: NGS read simulator to eliminate read nucleotide bias in sequence analysis.Turkish journal of biology = Turk biyoloji dergisi · 2023Article
- Article
- Tamock: simulation of habitat-specific benchmark data in metagenomics.BMC bioinformatics · 2021Article
- Metagenome SNP calling via read-colored de Bruijn graphs.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2021Article
- ReSeq simulates realistic Illumina high-throughput sequencing data.Genome biology · 2021Article
- LEMMI: a continuous benchmarking platform for metagenomics classifiers.Genome research · 2020Article
- SimuSCoP: reliably simulate Illumina sequencing data based on position and context dependent profiles.BMC bioinformatics · 2020Article
- A broad survey of DNA sequence data simulation tools.Briefings in functional genomics · 2020Review
- Article
- Evolution of Multi-Resistance to Vancomycin, Daptomycin, and Linezolid in Methicillin-ResistantFrontiers in microbiology · 2020Article
- SEPATH: benchmarking the search for pathogens in human tissue whole genome sequence data leads to template pipelines.Genome biology · 2019Article
- Microbial abundance, activity and population genomic profiling with mOTUs2.Nature communications · 2019Article
- CAMISIM: simulating metagenomes and microbial communities.Microbiome · 2019Article
- Simulating Illumina metagenomic data with InSilicoSeq.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2019Article
- SVEngine: an efficient and versatile simulator of genome structural variations with features of cancer clonal evolution.GigaScience · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere are many programs available for generating simulated whole-genome shotgun sequence reads. The data generated by many of these programs follow predefined models, which limits their use to the authors' original intentions. For example, many models assume that read lengths follow a uniform or normal distribution. Other programs generate models from actual sequencing data, but are limited to reads from single-genome studies. To our knowledge, there are no programs that allow a user to generate simulated data following non-parametric read-length distributions and quality profiles based on empirically-derived information from metagenomics sequencing data.
resultsWe present BEAR (Better Emulation for Artificial Reads), a program that uses a machine-learning approach to generate reads with lengths and quality values that closely match empirically-derived distributions. BEAR can emulate reads from various sequencing platforms, including Illumina, 454, and Ion Torrent. BEAR requires minimal user input, as it automatically determines appropriate parameter settings from user-supplied data. BEAR also uses a unique method for deriving run-specific error rates, and extracts useful statistics from the metagenomic data itself, such as quality-error models. Many existing simulators are specific to a particular sequencing technology; however, BEAR is not restricted in this way. Because of its flexibility, BEAR is particularly useful for emulating the behaviour of technologies like Ion Torrent, for which no dedicated sequencing simulators are currently available. BEAR is also the first metagenomic sequencing simulator program that automates the process of generating abundances, which can be an arduous task.
conclusionsBEAR is useful for evaluating data processing tools in genomics. It has many advantages over existing comparable software, such as generating more realistic reads and being independent of sequencing technology, and has features particularly useful for metagenomics work.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.