Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25253081›Full record

ArticleImplementation science : IS2014

Capacity building for evidence-based decision making in local health departments: scaling up an effective training approach.

Julie A Jacobs, Kathleen Duggan, Paul Erwin, Carson Smith, Elaine Borawski, Judy Compton, Luann D'Ambrosio, Scott H Frank, Susan Frazier-Kouassi, Peggy A Hannon and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science : IS, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Preferred modalities for delivering continuing education to the public health workforce: a scoping review.Health promotion and chronic disease prevention in Canada : research, policy and practice · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Julie A Jacobs
Kathleen Duggan
Paul Erwin
Carson Smith
Elaine Borawski
Judy Compton
Luann D'Ambrosio
Scott H Frank
Susan Frazier-Kouassi
Peggy A Hannon
Jennifer Leeman
Avia Mainor
Ross C Brownson

Funding

Clinical and Translational Science Collaborative of ClevelandUL1TR000439 · NCATS · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI KONSTAN, MICHAEL W. · 2012 to 2016
$50.0M
Washington University Center for Diabetes Translation Research P30DK092950 · NIDDK · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Ross C Brownson, Debra Haire-Joshu · 2011 to 2026
$11.7M
HPDPRC SIP 13-66U48DP001903 · DP · SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY · PI BAKER, ELIZABETH A · 2009 to 2013
$7.3M
PROMOTING HEALTH AND PREVENTING DISEASE IN DISADVANTAGED URBAN NEIGHBORHOODSU48DP001930 · DP · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI BORAWSKI, ELAINE A. · 2009 to 2013
$3.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000439NCCDPHP CDC HHS U48 DP001903NCCDPHP CDC HHS U48/DP001903NCCDPHP CDC HHS U48 DP001930NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092950
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are few studies describing how to scale up effective capacity-building approaches for public health practitioners. This study tested local-level evidence-based decision making (EBDM) capacity-building efforts in four U.S. states (Michigan, North Carolina, Ohio, and Washington) with a quasi-experimental design.

methodsPartners within the four states delivered a previously established Evidence-Based Public Health (EBPH) training curriculum to local health department (LHD) staff. They worked with the research team to modify the curriculum with local data and examples while remaining attentive to course fidelity. Pre- and post-assessments of course participants (n=82) and an external control group (n=214) measured importance, availability (i.e., how available a skill is when needed, either within the skillset of the respondent or among others in the agency), and gaps in ten EBDM competencies. Simple and multiple linear regression models assessed the differences between pre- and post-assessment scores. Course participants also assessed the impact of the course on their work.

resultsCourse participants reported greater increases in the availability, and decreases in the gaps, in EBDM competencies at post-test, relative to the control group. In adjusted models, significant differences (p<0.05) were found in 'action planning,' 'evaluation design,' 'communicating research to policymakers,' 'quantifying issues (using descriptive epidemiology),' and 'economic evaluation.' Nearly 45% of participants indicated that EBDM increased within their agency since the training. Course benefits included becoming better leaders and making scientifically informed decisions.

conclusionsThis study demonstrates the potential for improving EBDM capacity among LHD practitioners using a train-the-trainer approach involving diverse partners. This approach allowed for local tailoring of strategies and extended the reach of the EBPH course.

Indexed as

Decision MakingCapacity BuildingControl GroupsData CollectionData Interpretation, StatisticalEvidence-Based PracticeFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansMalePersonnel SelectionProfessional CompetencePublic HealthSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID25253081
PMCPMC4180843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.