Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25252978›Full record

ArticleNature2014

Multiplex single-molecule interaction profiling of DNA-barcoded proteins.

Liangcai Gu, Chao Li, John Aach, David E Hill, Marc Vidal, George M Church

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 88 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. In vivo mRNA display enables large-scale proteomics by next generation sequencing.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Liangcai GuDepartment of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.
Chao LiWyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.
John AachDepartment of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.
David E Hill1] Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA [2] Center for Cancer Systems Biology (CCSB) and Department of Cancer Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA.
Marc Vidal1] Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA [2] Center for Cancer Systems Biology (CCSB) and Department of Cancer Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA.
George M Church1] Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA [2] Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.
Harvard University · US

Funding

The C. elegans Interactome ProjectR01HG001715 · NHGRI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI HILL, DAVID E., ROTH, FREDERICK P · 1998 to 2010
$16.5M
Mapping the first half of the REFERENCE human binary protein interactomeU01HG001715 · NHGRI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI HILL, DAVID E., ROTH, FREDERICK P · 2012 to 2014
$5.4M
Resource ProjectU41HG001715 · NHGRI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI HILL, DAVID E. · 2015 to 2017
$4.7M
NHGRI NIH HHS HG001715NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG001715NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG001715NHGRI NIH HHS U41 HG001715
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In contrast with advances in massively parallel DNA sequencing, high-throughput protein analyses are often limited by ensemble measurements, individual analyte purification and hence compromised quality and cost-effectiveness. Single-molecule protein detection using optical methods is limited by the number of spectrally non-overlapping chromophores. Here we introduce a single-molecular-interaction sequencing (SMI-seq) technology for parallel protein interaction profiling leveraging single-molecule advantages. DNA barcodes are attached to proteins collectively via ribosome display or individually via enzymatic conjugation. Barcoded proteins are assayed en masse in aqueous solution and subsequently immobilized in a polyacrylamide thin film to construct a random single-molecule array, where barcoding DNAs are amplified into in situ polymerase colonies (polonies) and analysed by DNA sequencing. This method allows precise quantification of various proteins with a theoretical maximum array density of over one million polonies per square millimetre. Furthermore, protein interactions can be measured on the basis of the statistics of colocalized polonies arising from barcoding DNAs of interacting proteins. Two demanding applications, G-protein coupled receptor and antibody-binding profiling, are demonstrated. SMI-seq enables 'library versus library' screening in a one-pot assay, simultaneously interrogating molecular binding affinity and specificity.

Indexed as

DNADNA, ComplementaryGene Expression ProfilingImmunoprecipitationNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesPeptide LibraryRNA, MessengerDNADNA, ComplementaryPeptide LibraryRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID25252978
PMCPMC4246050
OpenAlexW2046538549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.