Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25252699›Full record

Trial reportClimacteric : the journal of the International Menopause Society2015

Female sexual function improved with ospemifene in postmenopausal women with vulvar and vaginal atrophy: results of a randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

G Constantine, S Graham, D J Portman, R C Rosen, S A Kingsberg

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Climacteric : the journal of the International Menopause Society, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 143 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Efficacy of Hormonal and Nonhormonal Approaches to Vaginal Atrophy and Sexual Dysfunctions in Postmenopausal Women: A Systematic Review.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2022
    Pooled it
  4. Cardiovascular Changes in Menopause.Current cardiology reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Canadian Breast Cancer Symposium 2023 Meeting Report.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The 2020 Menopausal Hormone Therapy Guidelines.Journal of menopausal medicine · 2020
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Female Sexual Function at Midlife and Beyond.Obstetrics and gynecology clinics of North America · 2018
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

G ConstantineEndoRheum Consultants , Media, PA.
S Graham
D J Portman
R C Rosen
S A Kingsberg
Columbus Center · USNew England Research Institutes · USShionogi (United States) · USWestern University of Health Sciences · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOspemifene is a non-estrogen, tissue selective estrogen receptor agonist/antagonist, or selective estrogen receptor modulator, recently approved for the treatment of dyspareunia, a symptom of vulvar and vaginal atrophy (VVA), due to menopause. Postmenopausal dyspareunia is often associated with female sexual dysfunction (FSD). In this report, we present data that demonstrate the effect of ospemifene 60 mg/day on FSD assessed by the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), a widely used tool with six domains (Arousal, Desire, Orgasm, Lubrication, Satisfaction, and Pain).

methodsA phase-3, randomized, double-blind, 12-week trial (n = 919) compared the efficacy and safety of oral ospemifene 60 mg/day vs. placebo in postmenopausal women with VVA in two strata based on self-reported, most bothersome symptom of either dyspareunia or dryness. Primary data were published previously. We report herein pre-specified secondary efficacy endpoints analyses, including changes from baseline to Weeks 4 and 12 for FSFI total and domain scores as well as serum hormone levels.

resultsOspemifene 60 mg/day demonstrated a significantly greater FSFI total score improvement vs. placebo at Week 4 (p < 0.001). Improvement in FSFI scores continued to Week 12 (p < 0.001). At Week 4, the FSFI domains of Sexual Pain, Arousal, and Desire were significantly improved with ospemifene vs. placebo; at Week 12, improvements in all domains were significant (p < 0.05). Changes in serum hormones were minor and uncorrelated with changes in sexual functioning.

conclusionIn a large, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, ospemifene 60 mg/day significantly improved FSD in women with VVA. Consistent effects across FSFI domains were observed.

Indexed as

Selective Estrogen Receptor ModulatorsAgedAtrophyDouble-Blind MethodDyspareuniaFemaleHormonesHumansMiddle AgedPlacebosSexual Dysfunction, PhysiologicalSurveys and QuestionnairesTamoxifenTreatment OutcomeVaginaVulvaHormonesOspemifenePlacebosSelective Estrogen Receptor ModulatorsTamoxifenDYSPAREUNIAFEMALE SEXUAL DYSFUNCTIONMENOPAUSEOSPEMIFENETISSUE-SELECTIVE ESTROGEN AGONIST/ANTAGONISTVULVAR AND VAGINAL ATROPHY

Identifiers

PMID25252699
PMCPMC4389697
OpenAlexW2079295844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.