Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25252652›Full record

ReviewReproduction (Cambridge, England)2015

Antiprogestins in gynecological diseases.

Alicia A Goyeneche, Carlos M Telleria

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Reproduction (Cambridge, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. New insights on the pathogenesis of endometriosis and novel non-surgical therapiesJournal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association · 2018
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Progesterone action in breast, uterine, and ovarian cancers.Journal of molecular endocrinology · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alicia A GoyenecheDivision of Basic Biomedical SciencesSanford School of Medicine, The University of South Dakota, Vermillion, South Dakota 57069, USA.
Carlos M TelleriaDivision of Basic Biomedical SciencesSanford School of Medicine, The University of South Dakota, Vermillion, South Dakota 57069, USA carlos.telleria@usd.edu.
University of South Dakota · US

Funding

Antiprogestin therapy for ovarian cancerR15CA164622 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH DAKOTA · PI TELLERIA, CARLOS MARCELO · 2012 to 2012
$426k
NCI NIH HHS R15 CA164622
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antiprogestins constitute a group of compounds, developed since the early 1980s, that bind progesterone receptors with different affinities. The first clinical uses for antiprogestins were in reproductive medicine, e.g., menstrual regulation, emergency contraception, and termination of early pregnancies. These initial applications, however, belied the capacity for these compounds to interfere with cell growth. Within the context of gynecological diseases, antiprogestins can block the growth of and kill gynecological-related cancer cells, such as those originating in the breast, ovary, endometrium, and cervix. They can also interrupt the excessive growth of cells giving rise to benign gynecological diseases such as endometriosis and leiomyomata (uterine fibroids). In this article, we present a review of the literature providing support for the antigrowth activity that antiprogestins impose on cells in various gynecological diseases. We also provide a summary of the cellular and molecular mechanisms reported for these compounds that lead to cell growth inhibition and death. The preclinical knowledge gained during the past few years provides robust evidence to encourage the use of antiprogestins in order to alleviate the burden of gynecological diseases, either as monotherapies or as adjuvants of other therapies with the perspective of allowing for long-term treatments with tolerable side effects. The key to the clinical success of antiprogestins in this field probably lies in selecting those patients who will benefit from this therapy. This can be achieved by defining the genetic makeup required - within each particular gynecological disease - for attaining an objective response to antiprogestin-driven growth inhibition therapy.Free Spanish abstractA Spanish translation of this abstract is freely available at http://www.reproduction-online.org/content/149/1/15/suppl/DC1.

Indexed as

FemaleGenital Diseases, FemaleHormone AntagonistsHumansProgestinsHormone AntagonistsProgestins

Identifiers

PMID25252652
PMCPMC4247796
OpenAlexW2135024929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.