Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25251413›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Phylogenetic analysis of phenotypically characterized Cryptococcus laurentii isolates reveals high frequency of cryptic species.

Kennio Ferreira-Paim, Thatiana Bragine Ferreira, Leonardo Andrade-Silva, Delio Jose Mora, Deborah J Springer, Joseph Heitman, Fernanda Machado Fonseca, Dulcilena Matos, Márcia Souza Carvalho Melhem, Mario León Silva-Vergara

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Two novel species ofMycoKeys · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Cryptococcus depauperatus, a close relative of the human-pathogen C. neoformans, associated with coffee leaf rust (Hemileia vastatrix) in Cameroon.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Fatal Case of Fungemia byJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Kennio Ferreira-PaimDepartment of Infectious and Parasitic Diseases, Triangulo Mineiro Federal University, Uberaba, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Thatiana Bragine FerreiraDepartment of Infectious and Parasitic Diseases, Triangulo Mineiro Federal University, Uberaba, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Leonardo Andrade-SilvaDepartment of Infectious and Parasitic Diseases, Triangulo Mineiro Federal University, Uberaba, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Delio Jose MoraDepartment of Infectious and Parasitic Diseases, Triangulo Mineiro Federal University, Uberaba, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Deborah J SpringerDepartment of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Joseph HeitmanDepartment of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America; Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America; Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Fernanda Machado FonsecaDepartment of Infectious and Parasitic Diseases, Triangulo Mineiro Federal University, Uberaba, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Dulcilena MatosPublic Health Reference Laboratory, Adolfo Lutz Institute, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Márcia Souza Carvalho MelhemPublic Health Reference Laboratory, Adolfo Lutz Institute, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Mario León Silva-VergaraDepartment of Infectious and Parasitic Diseases, Triangulo Mineiro Federal University, Uberaba, Minas Gerais, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough Cryptococcus laurentii has been considered saprophytic and its taxonomy is still being described, several cases of human infections have already reported. This study aimed to evaluate molecular aspects of C. laurentii isolates from Brazil, Botswana, Canada, and the United States.

methodsIn this study, 100 phenotypically identified C. laurentii isolates were evaluated by sequencing the 18S nuclear ribosomal small subunit rRNA gene (18S-SSU), D1/D2 region of 28S nuclear ribosomal large subunit rRNA gene (28S-LSU), and the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) of the ribosomal region.

resultsBLAST searches using 550-bp, 650-bp, and 550-bp sequenced amplicons obtained from the 18S-SSU, 28S-LSU, and the ITS region led to the identification of 75 C. laurentii strains that shared 99-100% identity with C. laurentii CBS 139. A total of nine isolates shared 99% identity with both Bullera sp. VY-68 and C. laurentii RY1. One isolate shared 99% identity with Cryptococcus rajasthanensis CBS 10406, and eight isolates shared 100% identity with Cryptococcus sp. APSS 862 according to the 28S-LSU and ITS regions and designated as Cryptococcus aspenensis sp. nov. (CBS 13867). While 16 isolates shared 99% identity with Cryptococcus flavescens CBS 942 according to the 18S-SSU sequence, only six were confirmed using the 28S-LSU and ITS region sequences. The remaining 10 shared 99% identity with Cryptococcus terrestris CBS 10810, which was recently described in Brazil. Through concatenated sequence analyses, seven sequence types in C. laurentii, three in C. flavescens, one in C. terrestris, and one in the C. aspenensis sp. nov. were identified.

conclusionsSequencing permitted the characterization of 75% of the environmental C. laurentii isolates from different geographical areas and the identification of seven haplotypes of this species. Among sequenced regions, the increased variability of the ITS region in comparison to the 18S-SSU and 28S-LSU regions reinforces its applicability as a DNA barcode.

Indexed as

PhylogenyCryptococcusHaplotypesSpecies Specificity

Identifiers

PMID25251413
PMCPMC4177401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.