Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25251041›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of hematology2015

Improving outcomes for patients with acute myeloid leukemia in first relapse: a single center experience.

Naveen Pemmaraju, Hagop Kantarjian, Guillermo Garcia-Manero, Sherry Pierce, Marylou Cardenas-Turanzas, Jorge Cortes, Farhad Ravandi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of hematology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Naveen PemmarajuDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Hagop Kantarjian
Guillermo Garcia-Manero
Sherry Pierce
Marylou Cardenas-Turanzas
Jorge Cortes
Farhad Ravandi

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Fabien Delerue · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS P30CA16672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The outcome of patients with relapsed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remains unsatisfactory, with few available effective therapies. Increased understanding of the biology of the disease has led to the identification of novel therapeutic agents, several of which have been evaluated in recently conducted clinical trials. We sought to determine whether the introduction of these agents as well as modern supportive care measures has already translated to better outcomes. We examined the outcomes of 1,056 patients with AML in first relapse treated between January 1993 and December 2013 at our institution. As previously reported, the independent prognostic factors for survival after first relapse included age at relapse, cytogenetics, and duration of first complete remission. Upon multivariable analysis, treatment era was an independent predictor of survival, with significant improvement in overall survival between 2008 and 2013 as compared to prior time periods. Modern supportive care measures as well as participation in clinical trials of novel agents are already improving the outcomes in first relapse.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic AgentsDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteMaleMiddle AgedMolecular Targeted TherapyMultivariate AnalysisRecurrenceRemission InductionAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID25251041
PMCPMC4276516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.