Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25250986›Full record

ReviewJournal of ocular pharmacology and therapeutics : the official journal of the Association for Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics2014

Peptide therapeutics for treating ocular surface infections.

Curtis R Brandt

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of ocular pharmacology and therapeutics : the official journal of the Association for Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Diversity, evolution and medical applications of insect antimicrobial peptides.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2016
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Challenges of corneal infections.Expert review of ophthalmology · 2016
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Curtis R BrandtDepartments of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences and Medical Microbiology and Immunology, McPherson Eye Research Institute, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health , Madison, Wisconsin.
University of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

UW Vision Research Core - Administrative CoreP30EY016665 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Colleen Mary McDowell · 2005 to 2026
$12.6M
PEPTIDE INHIBITORS OF PAPILLOMAVIRAL INFECTIONP01AI052049 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON · PI BRANDT, CURTIS R · 2001 to 2004
$3.5M
Virion Sialic Acid and HSV Ocular InfectionR01EY018597 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI BRANDT, CURTIS R · 2008 to 2011
$1.5M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY016665NEI NIH HHS P30EY016665NEI NIH HHS R01 EY018597NIAID NIH HHS P01 AI52049
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbial pathogens-bacteria, viruses, fungi, and parasites-are significant causes of blindness, particularly in developing countries. For bacterial and some viral infections a number of antimicrobial drugs are available for therapy but there are fewer available for use in treating fungal and parasitic keratitis. There are also problems with current antimicrobials, such as limited efficacy and the presence of drug-resistant microbes. Thus, there is a need to develop additional drugs. Nature has given us an example of 1 potential source of new antimicrobials: antimicrobial peptides and proteins that are either present in bodily fluids and tissues constitutively or are induced upon infection. Given the nature of peptides, topical applications are the most likely use to be successful and this is ideal for treating keratitis. Such peptides would also be active against drug-resistant pathogens and might act synergistically if used in combination therapy. Hundreds of peptides with antimicrobial properties have been isolated or synthesized but only a handful have been tested against ocular pathogens and even fewer have been tested in animal models. This review summarizes the currently available information on the use of peptides to treat keratitis, outlines some of the problems that have been identified, and discusses future studies that will be needed. Most of the peptides that have been tested have shown activity at concentrations that do not warrant further development, but 1 or 2 have promising activity raising the possibility that peptides can be developed to treat keratitis.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Infective AgentsDisease Models, AnimalDrug DesignDrug Resistance, MicrobialDrug SynergismHumansKeratitisPeptidesAnti-Infective AgentsPeptides

Identifiers

PMID25250986
PMCPMC4220699
OpenAlexW2320708635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.