Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25250675›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Facilitating surveillance of pulmonary invasive mold diseases in patients with haematological malignancies by screening computed tomography reports using natural language processing.

Michelle R Ananda-Rajah, David Martinez, Monica A Slavin, Lawrence Cavedon, Michael Dooley, Allen Cheng, Karin A Thursky

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Impact of translation on named-entity recognition in radiology texts.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2017
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Michelle R Ananda-RajahInfectious Diseases Unit, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
David MartinezComputing and Information Systems, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Monica A SlavinVictorian Infectious Diseases Service, Peter Doherty Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Infectious diseases department, Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Lawrence CavedonSchool of Computer Science and IT, RMIT University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Michael DooleyPharmacy Department, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Faculty of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical Science, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Allen ChengInfectious Diseases Unit, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Epidemiology and Preventative Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Karin A ThurskyVictorian Infectious Diseases Service, Peter Doherty Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Infectious diseases department, Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeProspective surveillance of invasive mold diseases (IMDs) in haematology patients should be standard of care but is hampered by the absence of a reliable laboratory prompt and the difficulty of manual surveillance. We used a high throughput technology, natural language processing (NLP), to develop a classifier based on machine learning techniques to screen computed tomography (CT) reports supportive for IMDs. PATIENTS AND

methodsWe conducted a retrospective case-control study of CT reports from the clinical encounter and up to 12-weeks after, from a random subset of 79 of 270 case patients with 33 probable/proven IMDs by international definitions, and 68 of 257 uninfected-control patients identified from 3 tertiary haematology centres. The classifier was trained and tested on a reference standard of 449 physician annotated reports including a development subset (n = 366), from a total of 1880 reports, using 10-fold cross validation, comparing binary and probabilistic predictions to the reference standard to generate sensitivity, specificity and area under the receiver-operating-curve (ROC).

resultsFor the development subset, sensitivity/specificity was 91% (95%CI 86% to 94%)/79% (95%CI 71% to 84%) and ROC area was 0.92 (95%CI 89% to 94%). Of 25 (5.6%) missed notifications, only 4 (0.9%) reports were regarded as clinically significant.

conclusionCT reports are a readily available and timely resource that may be exploited by NLP to facilitate continuous prospective IMD surveillance with translational benefits beyond surveillance alone.

Indexed as

Natural Language ProcessingAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCase-Control StudiesFemaleHematologic NeoplasmsHumansLung DiseasesMaleMiddle AgedMycosesPopulation SurveillanceRetrospective StudiesROC Curve

Identifiers

PMID25250675
PMCPMC4175456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.