Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25250228›Full record

ArticleTropical parasitology2014

Laboratory methods of identification of Entamoeba histolytica and its differentiation from look-alike Entamoeba spp.

Subhash Chandra Parija, Jharna Mandal, Dinoop Korol Ponnambath

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical parasitology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Prevalence and associated risk factors ofJournal of parasitic diseases : official organ of the Indian Society for Parasitology · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Accurate laboratory diagnosis of human intestinal and extra-intestinal amoebiasis.Gastroenterology and hepatology from bed to bench · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Comparison of Microscopy and PCR for Detection ofEthiopian journal of health sciences · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Update on laboratory diagnosis of amoebiasis.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2019
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Occurrence ofInternational journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2017
    Article
  19. Article
  20. PeerJ · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Subhash Chandra ParijaDepartment of Microbiology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research Gorimedu, Puducherry, India.
Jharna MandalDepartment of Microbiology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research Gorimedu, Puducherry, India.
Dinoop Korol PonnambathDepartment of Microbiology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research Gorimedu, Puducherry, India.
Jawaharlal Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Entamoeba histolytica, the causative agent of intestinal and extraintestinal amebiasis, is a common parasitic cause of significant morbidity and mortality in the developing countries. Hence, early detection and differentiation of pathogenic E. histolytica from nonpathogenic/commensal Entamoeba spp (Entamoeba dispar/Entamoeba moshkovskii/Entamoeba bangladeshi) plays a crucial role in clinical management of patients with amebiasis. Most diagnostic tests currently available do not reliably differentiate between the species of Entamoeba and are less sensitive, cumbersome to perform. Molecular-based methods are highly sensitive, easy to perform and differentiates the pathogenic Entamoeba from nonpathogenic species, serving the criteria for an ideal diagnostic test for amebiasis. Recently, microarray technology has been found to be a promising tool for the diagnostic and epidemiological evaluation of amebiasis.

Indexed as

AmebiasisEntamoeba histolyticalaboratory diagnosis

Identifiers

PMID25250228
PMCPMC4166809
OpenAlexW2034494554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.