Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25250206›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2014

Assessment of blood flow with (68)Ga-DOTA PET in experimental inflammation: a validation study using (15)O-water.

Anu Autio, Antti Saraste, Nobuyuki Kudomi, Tiina Saanijoki, Jarkko Johansson, Heidi Liljenbäck, Miikka Tarkia, Vesa Oikonen, Hannu T Sipilä, Anne Roivainen

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Quantitative assessment of myocardial blood flow and extracellular volume fraction usingJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2020
    Article
  3. What did we learn from PET/MR?Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2020
    Article
  4. Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Prospective ofContrast media & molecular imaging · 2018
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Anu AutioTurku PET Centre Turku, Finland.
Antti SarasteTurku PET Centre Turku, Finland ; Heart Center, Turku University Hospital and University of Turku Turku, Finland.
Nobuyuki KudomiTurku PET Centre Turku, Finland ; Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Medicine, Kagawa University Japan.
Tiina SaanijokiTurku PET Centre Turku, Finland.
Jarkko JohanssonTurku PET Centre Turku, Finland.
Heidi LiljenbäckTurku PET Centre Turku, Finland ; Turku Center for Disease Modeling, University of Turku Turku, Finland.
Miikka TarkiaTurku PET Centre Turku, Finland.
Vesa OikonenTurku PET Centre Turku, Finland.
Hannu T SipiläTurku PET Centre Turku, Finland.
Anne RoivainenTurku PET Centre Turku, Finland ; Turku Center for Disease Modeling, University of Turku Turku, Finland.
Turku PET Centre · FIUniversity of Turku · FITurku University Hospital · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Increased blood flow and vascular permeability are key events in inflammation. Based on the fact that Gadolinium-1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-N,N',N'',N'''-tetraacetic acid (Gd-DOTA) is commonly used in magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of blood flow (perfusion), we evaluated the feasibility of its Gallium-68 labeled DOTA analog ((68)Ga-DOTA) for positron emission tomography (PET) imaging of blood flow in experimental inflammation. Adult, male Sprague-Dawley rats with turpentine oil induced sterile skin/muscle inflammation were anesthetized with isoflurane, and imaged under rest and adenosine-induced hyperemia by means of dynamic 2-min Oxygen-15 labeled water (H2 (15)O) and 30-min (68)Ga-DOTA PET. For the quantification of PET data, regions of interest (ROIs) were defined in the focus of inflammation, healthy muscle, myocardium and heart left ventricle. Radioactivity concentration in the ROIs versus time after injection was determined for both tracers and blood flow was calculated using image-derived input. According to the H2 (15)O PET, blood flow was 0.69 ± 0.15 ml/min/g for inflammation and 0.15 ± 0.03 ml/min/g for muscle during rest. The blood flow remained unchanged during adenosine-induced hyperemia 0.67 ± 0.11 and 0.12 ± 0.03 ml/min/g for inflammation and muscle, respectively, indicating that adenosine has little effect on blood flow in peripheral tissues in rats. High focal uptake of (68)Ga-DOTA was seen at the site of inflammation throughout the 30-min PET imaging. According to the (68)Ga-DOTA PET, blood flow measured as the blood-to-tissue transport rate (K1) was 0.60 ± 0.07 ml/min/g for inflammation and 0.14 ± 0.06 ml/min/g for muscle during rest and 0.63 ± 0.08 ml/min/g for inflammation and 0.09 ± 0.04 ml/min/g for muscle during adenosine-induced hyperemia. The H2 (15)O-based blood flow and (68)Ga-DOTA-based K1 values correlated well (r = 0.94, P < 0.0001). These results show that (68)Ga-DOTA PET imaging is useful for the quantification of increased blood flow induced by inflammation.

Indexed as

Blood flowDOTAGallium-68inflammationOxygen-15 waterPETrat

Identifiers

PMID25250206
PMCPMC4171843
OpenAlexW2414315395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.