Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25250176›Full record

ArticleMicrobiome2014

Intestinal anastomotic injury alters spatially defined microbiome composition and function.

Benjamin D Shogan, Daniel P Smith, Scott Christley, Jack A Gilbert, Olga Zaborina, John C Alverdy

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiome, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07050485 (Postbiotics for Mitigation of Postoperative Dysbiosis in Gastrointestinal Cancer Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 102 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
102citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
10.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07050485 naenrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Postbiotics for Mitigation of Postoperative Dysbiosis in Gastrointestinal Cancer Surgery: A Randomized, Single-blinded, Placebo-controlled Trial (REPOT)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of South FloridaRan2025 to 2026Enrolled30ConditionsColon Cancer, Gastrointestinal CancerArmsPoZibio, Inert placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

102 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 162 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. The perioperative microbiome of patients undergoing rectal cancer surgery: A pilot study.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. CollagenolyticSurgery open science · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Intraoperative assessment of anastomotic microcirculation during right hemicolectomy with real-time laser speckle contrast imaging is safe and feasible.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2025
    Article
  18. Global, regional, and national burdens ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2025
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

42 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Benjamin D ShoganDepartment of Surgery, University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
Daniel P SmithInstitute for Genomic and Systems Biology, Argonne National Laboratory, 9700 South Cass Avenue, Argonne, IL 60439, USA ; Current address: Center for Metagenomics and Microbiome Research, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Scott ChristleyDepartment of Surgery, University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
Jack A GilbertInstitute for Genomic and Systems Biology, Argonne National Laboratory, 9700 South Cass Avenue, Argonne, IL 60439, USA ; Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
Olga ZaborinaDepartment of Surgery, University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
John C AlverdyDepartment of Surgery, University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
University of Chicago · USArgonne National Laboratory · US

Funding

Re-Engineering Translational Research at the University of ChicagoUL1TR000430 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI SOLWAY, JULIAN · 2012 to 2016
$20.2M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000430
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhen diseased intestine (i.e., from colon cancer, diverticulitis) requires resection, its reconnection (termed anastomosis) can be complicated by non-healing of the newly joined intestine resulting in spillage of intestinal contents into the abdominal cavity (termed anastomotic leakage). While it is suspected that the intestinal microbiota have the capacity to both accelerate and complicate anastomotic healing, the associated genotypes and functions have not been characterized.

resultsUsing 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing of samples collected on the day of surgery (postoperative day 0 (POD0)) and the 6th day following surgery (postoperative day 0 (POD6)), we analyzed the changes in luminal versus tissue-associated microbiota at anastomotic sites created in the colon of rats. Results indicated that anastomotic injury induced significant changes in the anastomotic tissue-associated microbiota with minimal differences in the luminal microbiota. The most striking difference was a 500-fold and 200-fold increase in the relative abundance of Enterococcus and Escherichia/Shigella, respectively. Functional profiling predicted the predominance of bacterial virulence-associated pathways in post-anastomotic tissues, including production of hemolysin, cytolethal toxins, fimbriae, invasins, cytotoxic necrotizing factors, and coccolysin.

conclusionTaken together, our results suggest that compositional and functional changes accompany anastomotic tissues and may potentially accelerate or complicate anastomotic healing.

Indexed as

16S rRNAAnastomotic tissuesBacterial compositionColon anastomosisLuminal contentPiCRUSTPredicted function

Identifiers

PMID25250176
PMCPMC4171717
OpenAlexW2118899310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.