Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25250029›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2014

The role of myeloid cell activation and arginine metabolism in the pathogenesis of virus-induced diseases.

Kristina S Burrack, Thomas E Morrison

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04368156 (A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study Assessing Vagus Nerve Stimulation in CoViD-19 Respiratory Symptoms), which is not on this map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04368156 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study Assessing Vagus Nerve Stimulation in CoViD-19 Respiratory Symptoms (SAVIOR)

TypeinterventionalSponsorCarlos TorneroRan2020 to 2021Enrolled110ConditionsCovid-19ArmsgammaCore® (Vagus nerve stimulation)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Recruited atypical Ly6GScience immunology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Host-virus interaction and viral evasion.Cell biology international · 2021
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kristina S BurrackDepartment of Immunology and Microbiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine , Aurora, CO , USA.
Thomas E MorrisonDepartment of Immunology and Microbiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine , Aurora, CO , USA.

Funding

Screening CoreU19AI109680 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI WHITLEY, RICHARD J. · 2014 to 2018
$34.9M
Molecular Pathogenesis of Infectious DiseasesT32AI052066 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI VAN DYK, LINDA F. · 2002 to 2022
$2.3M
Mechanisms of immune suppression during arthritogenic alphavirus infectionsR01AI108725 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI MORRISON, THOMAS E · 2014 to 2018
$1.9M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI108725NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI052066NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI109680
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

WHEN AN ANTIVIRAL IMMUNE RESPONSE IS GENERATED, A BALANCE MUST BE REACHED BETWEEN TWO OPPOSING PATHWAYS: the production of proinflammatory and cytotoxic effectors that drive a robust antiviral immune response to control the infection and regulators that function to limit or blunt an excessive immune response to minimize immune-mediated pathology and repair tissue damage. Myeloid cells, including monocytes and macrophages, play an important role in this balance, particularly through the activities of the arginine-hydrolyzing enzymes nitric oxide synthase 2 (Nos2; iNOS) and arginase 1 (Arg1). Nitric oxide (NO) production by iNOS is an important proinflammatory mediator, whereas Arg1-expressing macrophages contribute to the resolution of inflammation and wound repair. In the context of viral infections, expression of these enzymes can result in a variety of outcomes for the host. NO has direct antiviral properties against some viruses, whereas during other virus infections NO can mediate immunopathology and/or inhibit the antiviral immune response to promote chronic infection. Arg1 activity not only has important wound healing functions but can also inhibit the antiviral immune response during some viral infections. Thus, depending on the specific virus and the tissue(s) involved, the activity of both of these arginine-hydrolyzing enzymes can either exacerbate or limit the severity of virus-induced disease. In this review, we will discuss a variety of viral infections, including HIV, SARS-CoV, LCMV, HCV, RSV, and others, where myeloid cells influence the control and clearance of the virus from the host, as well as the severity and resolution of tissue damage, via the activities of iNOS and/or Arg1. Clearly, monocyte/macrophage activation and arginine metabolism will continue to be important areas of investigation in the context of viral infections.

Indexed as

arginasecellularimmunityiNOSmacrophagesviral pathogenicity

Identifiers

PMID25250029
PMCPMC4157561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.