ReviewFrontiers in psychiatry2014
Two-person neuroscience and naturalistic social communication: the role of language and linguistic variables in brain-coupling research.
Review in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring interpersonal neural synchrony in coach-athlete interactions: insights from naturalistic EEG hyperscanning in competitive tennis.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Article
- Dyadic Neural Synchronization: Differences between Offline and Computer-assisted Online Verbal Interaction.Human brain mapping · 2025Article
- LearningPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023Review
- Ecological Meanings: A Consensus Paper on Individual Differences and Contextual Influences in Embodied Language.Journal of cognition · 2023Article
- A Two-Person Neuroscience Approach for Social Anxiety: A Paradigm With Interbrain Synchrony and Neurofeedback.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Review
- The Interprocessual-Self Theory in Support of Human Neuroscience Studies.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
- Optimization of wavelet coherence analysis as a measure of neural synchrony during hyperscanning using functional near-infrared spectroscopy.Neurophotonics · 2020Article
- Interpersonal Agreement and Disagreement During Face-to-Face Dialogue: An fNIRS Investigation.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2020Article
- A cross-brain neural mechanism for human-to-human verbal communication.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2018Article
- Social neuroscience: undoing the schism between neurology and psychiatry.Social neuroscience · 2018Review
- Frontal temporal and parietal systems synchronize within and across brains during live eye-to-eye contact.NeuroImage · 2017Article
- Increased frequency of social interaction is associated with enjoyment enhancement and reward system activation.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Social cognitive neuroscience (SCN) seeks to understand the brain mechanisms through which we comprehend others' emotions and intentions in order to react accordingly. For decades, SCN has explored relevant domains by exposing individual participants to predesigned stimuli and asking them to judge their social (e.g., emotional) content. Subjects are thus reduced to detached observers of situations that they play no active role in. However, the core of our social experience is construed through real-time interactions requiring the active negotiation of information with other people. To gain more relevant insights into the workings of the social brain, the incipient field of two-person neuroscience (2PN) advocates the study of brain-to-brain coupling through multi-participant experiments. In this paper, we argue that the study of online language-based communication constitutes a cornerstone of 2PN. First, we review preliminary evidence illustrating how verbal interaction may shed light on the social brain. Second, we advance methodological recommendations to design experiments within language-based 2PN. Finally, we formulate outstanding questions for future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.