Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25249840›Full record

ReviewAnnals of burns and fire disasters2014

Building a multidisciplinary team for burn treatment - Lessons learned from the Montreal tendon transfer experience.

E Karam, M C Lévesque, G Jacquemin, A Delure, I Robidoux, M T Laramée, A Odobescu, P G Harris, A M Danino

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of burns and fire disasters, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Team principles for successful interdisciplinary research teams.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The Future of Burn Care From a Complexity Science Perspective.Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

E KaramCentre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Université de Montréal, Service de Chirurgie plastique, Hôpital Notre Dame, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
M C LévesqueUniversité de Laval, Québec, Canada.
G JacqueminInstitut de Réadaptation Gingras-Lindsay de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
A DelureInstitut de Réadaptation Gingras-Lindsay de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
I RobidouxInstitut de Réadaptation Gingras-Lindsay de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
M T LaraméeInstitut de Réadaptation Gingras-Lindsay de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
A OdobescuCentre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Université de Montréal, Service de Chirurgie plastique, Hôpital Notre Dame, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
P G HarrisCentre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Université de Montréal, Service de Chirurgie plastique, Hôpital Notre Dame, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
A M DaninoCentre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Université de Montréal, Service de Chirurgie plastique, Hôpital Notre Dame, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Université Laval · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) represent a recognized component of care in the treatment of complex conditions such as burns. However, most institutions do not provide adequate support for the formation of these teams. Furthermore, the majority of specialists lack the managerial skills required to create a team and have difficulties finding the proper tools. Our objective is to provide an insight for health care professionals, who wish to form a MDT for burn treatment, on the challenges that are likely to be faced, and to identify key elements that may facilitate the establishment of such a project. The setting for this was a plastic surgery department and rehabilitation center at a national reference center. A qualitative analysis was performed on all correspondences related to our tetraplegia project, from 2006 to 2008. To guide our thematic analysis, we used a form of systems theory known as the complexity theory. The qualitative analysis was performed using the NVivo software (Version 8.0 QSR International Melbourne, Australia). Lastly, the data was organized in chronologic order. Three main themes emerged from the results: knowledge acquisition, project organizational setup and project steps design. These themes represented respectively 24%, 50% and 26% of all correspondences. Project steps design and knowledge acquisition correspondences increased significantly after the introduction of the mentor team to our network. We conclude that an early association with a mentor team is beneficial for the establishment of a MDT.

Indexed as

burn treatmentcomplexity theoryinterdisciplinary teammultidisciplinary approachmultidisciplinary team

Identifiers

PMID25249840
PMCPMC4150479
OpenAlexW97403798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.