Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25249765›Full record

ArticleClinical medicine insights. Circulatory, respiratory and pulmonary medicine2014

Adherence to therapeutic guidelines for patients with community-acquired pneumonia in Australian hospitals.

Nr Adler, Hm Weber, I Gunadasa, Aj Hughes, Nd Friedman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical medicine insights. Circulatory, respiratory and pulmonary medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Audit of a multidisciplinary approach to improve management of community-acquired pneumonia.European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice · 2019
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nr AdlerSchool of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
Hm WeberSchool of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
I GunadasaSchool of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
Aj HughesDepartments of General Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Barwon Health, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
Nd FriedmanDepartments of General Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Barwon Health, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality, particularly in elderly patients, and is associated with a considerable economic burden on the healthcare system. The combination of high incidence and substantial financial costs necessitate accurate diagnosis and appropriate management of patients admitted with CAP. This article will discuss the rates of adherence to clinical guidelines, the use of severity scoring tools and the appropriateness of antimicrobial prescribing for patients diagnosed with CAP. The authors maintain that awareness of national and hospital guidelines is imperative to complement the physicians' clinical judgment with evidence-based recommendations. Increased use of pneumonia severity assessment tools and greater adherence to therapeutic guidelines will enhance concordant antimicrobial prescribing for patients with CAP. A robust and multifaceted educational intervention, in combination with antimicrobial stewardship programs, may enhance compliance of CAP guidelines in clinical practice in Australia.

Indexed as

antimicrobial prescribingclinical guidelinescommunity-acquired pneumoniapneumonia severity tools

Identifiers

PMID25249765
PMCPMC4167314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.