Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25249607›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2014

The heritability of dry eye disease in a female twin cohort.

Jelle Vehof, Bin Wang, Diana Kozareva, Pirro G Hysi, Harold Snieder, Christopher J Hammond

Open access · bronzeAbstract readTwin Study
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Cataract surgery and dry eye disease: A review.European journal of ophthalmology · 2020
    Review
  17. Dry Eye Disease: Consideration for Women's Health.Journal of women's health (2002) · 2019
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Neuropathic pain and dry eye.The ocular surface · 2018
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Jelle VehofDepartment of Twin Research & Genetic Epidemiology, King's College London, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Bin WangDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Diana KozarevaDepartment of Twin Research & Genetic Epidemiology, King's College London, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Pirro G HysiDepartment of Twin Research & Genetic Epidemiology, King's College London, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Harold SniederDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Christopher J HammondDepartment of Twin Research & Genetic Epidemiology, King's College London, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom Department of Ophthalmology, King's College London, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
King's College London · GBSt Thomas' Hospital · GBUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity of Groningen · NL

Funding

Department of Health SRF/01/010Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe estimated the relative importance of genes and environment in dry eye disease (DED) using a classic twin study.

methodsA large sample of 3930 female monozygotic and dizygotic twins from the UK Adult Twin Registry (TwinsUK) was questioned about the presence of a DED diagnosis and about DED symptoms in the preceding 3 months. In addition, a subset of 606 twins was examined for several dry eye signs. Genetic and environmental effects were estimated using maximum likelihood structural equation modeling.

resultsAll DED outcome variables showed higher correlation in monozygotic twin pairs than in dizygotic twin pairs, suggesting genes have a contributory role in DED. The DED symptoms showed a heritability of 29% (95% confidence interval [CI], 18%-40%). A clinician's diagnosis of DED with concurrent use of artificial tears showed a heritability of 41% (95% CI, 26%-56%). Estimates of the heritability of DED signs were 25% (95% CI, 7%-42%) for interblink interval, 58% (95% CI, 43%-70%) for Schirmer value, 40% (95% CI, 25%-53%) for tear osmolarity, and 78% (95% CI, 59%-90%) for the presence of blepharitis. The unique environment explained the remainder of the variance. We found no significant heritability for tear breakup time.

conclusionsGenetic factors contribute moderately to the diagnosis, symptoms, and the signs of DED. Compared to other ocular phenotypes, the lower heritability might reflect some of the difficulties in objective phenotyping of DED in a population-based sample. However, future genetic studies are now justified and may help in unraveling the pathophysiology of DED.

Indexed as

Diseases in TwinsGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseDiagnostic Techniques, OphthalmologicalDry Eye SyndromesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMiddle AgedPrevalenceRegistriesSurveys and QuestionnairesTwins, DizygoticTwins, MonozygoticUnited KingdomDEDdry eye diseaseenvironmentgeneticsheritabilityOSDIsicca syndrome

Identifiers

PMID25249607
PMCPMC4231992
OpenAlexW2032865064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.