ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2015
Patients' perceptions of colorectal cancer screening tests and preparatory education in federally qualified health centers.
Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Gender differences in the context of interventions for improving health literacy in migrants: a qualitative evidence synthesis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
- Trial
- Attitudes and beliefs regarding colorectal cancer screening among African American patients of community health centers in North-Central Florida and stakeholder perspectives: a qualitative study.BMC public health · 2026Article
- The Cost-Effectiveness of a Multi-Target Stool DNA-Based Screening (COLOTECT), FIT, Colonoscopy and No Screening for Colorectal Cancer.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2025Article
- Navigating the evolving landscape of colorectal cancer screening with a practical framework: a comprehensive analysis of existing and emerging technologies for informed decision-making.Oncology reviews · 2025Review
- Improving Guideline-Recommended Colorectal Cancer Screening in a Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC): Implementing a Patient Navigation and Practice Facilitation Intervention to Promote Health Equity.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024Article
- Implementing an enhanced mailed FIT program to improve CRC screening at a federally qualified health center: experiences of patients and staff.Translational behavioral medicine · 2023Article
- Disparities in Compliance with Colorectal Cancer Screening: Evidence from Two US National Surveys.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2023Article
- A qualitative study of patient preferences for prompts and reminders for a direct-mail fecal testing program.Translational behavioral medicine · 2021Article
- Novel Toilet Paper-Based Point-Of-Care Test for the Rapid Detection of Fecal Occult Blood: Instrument Validation Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Article
- Barriers and Facilitators to Timely Colonoscopy Completion for Safety Net Clinic Patients.American journal of health behavior · 2020Article
- 'Simple and easy:' providers' and latinos' perceptions of the fecal immunochemical test (FIT) for colorectal cancer screening.Ethnicity & health · 2020Article
- Fluctuating Behavior of the French Population in Cancer Screening: 5th Edition of the EDIFICE Survey.Current oncology reports · 2018Observational
- Educating Hispanic Women about Cervical Cancer Prevention: Feasibility of a Promotora-Led Charla Intervention in a Farmworker Community.Ethnicity & disease · 2018Article
- The ConNECT Framework: a model for advancing behavioral medicine science and practice to foster health equity.Journal of behavioral medicine · 2017Article
- Editorial: Colorectal Cancer Screening Education in Medically Vulnerable Populations: the Role of the Journal of Cancer Education.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2015Article
- Anal Cancer Prevention Perspectives Among Foreign-Born Latino HIV-Infected Gay and Bisexual Men.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
This study explored federally qualified health center (FQHC) patients' perceptions about colorectal cancer screening (CRCS) tests, including immunochemical fecal occult blood tests (iFOBT), as well as preferences for receiving in-clinic education about CRCS. Eight mixed gender focus groups were conducted with 53 patients. Findings centered on three thematic factors: (1) motivators and impediments to CRCS, (2) test-specific preferences and receptivity to iFOBTs, and (3) preferences for entertaining and engaging plain language materials. Results informed the development of educational priming materials to increase CRCS using iFOBT in FQHCs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.