Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25248936›Full record

ArticleJournal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology

Data analysis techniques: a tool for cumulative exposure assessment.

Benoît Lalloué, Jean-Marie Monnez, Cindy Padilla, Wahida Kihal, Denis Zmirou-Navier, Séverine Deguen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Do Individual and Neighborhood Characteristics Influence Perceived Air Quality?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2017
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Benoît Lalloué1] EHESP Rennes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Rennes, France [2] Inserm, UMR1085-IRSET (Institut de Recherche sur la Santé L'environnement et le Travail), Rennes, France [3] Lorraine University, Institut Elie Cartan de Lorraine, CNRS UMR 7502, Nancy, France [4] Lorraine University, INRIA, CNRS UMR7502, BIGS (INRIA Nancy - Grand Est/IECL), Nancy, France.
Jean-Marie Monnez1] Lorraine University, Institut Elie Cartan de Lorraine, CNRS UMR 7502, Nancy, France [2] Lorraine University, INRIA, CNRS UMR7502, BIGS (INRIA Nancy - Grand Est/IECL), Nancy, France.
Cindy Padilla1] EHESP Rennes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Rennes, France [2] Inserm, UMR1085-IRSET (Institut de Recherche sur la Santé L'environnement et le Travail), Rennes, France.
Wahida Kihal1] EHESP Rennes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Rennes, France [2] Inserm, UMR1085-IRSET (Institut de Recherche sur la Santé L'environnement et le Travail), Rennes, France.
Denis Zmirou-Navier1] EHESP Rennes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Rennes, France [2] Inserm, UMR1085-IRSET (Institut de Recherche sur la Santé L'environnement et le Travail), Rennes, France [3] Lorraine University Medical School, Nancy, France.
Séverine Deguen1] EHESP Rennes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Rennes, France [2] Inserm, UMR1085-IRSET (Institut de Recherche sur la Santé L'environnement et le Travail), Rennes, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Everyone is subject to environmental exposures from various sources, with negative health impacts (air, water and soil contamination, noise, etc.or with positive effects (e.g. green space). Studies considering such complex environmental settings in a global manner are rare. We propose to use statistical factor and cluster analyses to create a composite exposure index with a data-driven approach, in view to assess the environmental burden experienced by populations. We illustrate this approach in a large French metropolitan area. The study was carried out in the Great Lyon area (France, 1.2 M inhabitants) at the census Block Group (BG) scale. We used as environmental indicators ambient air NO2 annual concentrations, noise levels and proximity to green spaces, to industrial plants, to polluted sites and to road traffic. They were synthesized using Multiple Factor Analysis (MFA), a data-driven technique without a priori modeling, followed by a Hierarchical Clustering to create BG classes. The first components of the MFA explained, respectively, 30, 14, 11 and 9% of the total variance. Clustering in five classes group: (1) a particular type of large BGs without population; (2) BGs of green residential areas, with less negative exposures than average; (3) BGs of residential areas near midtown; (4) BGs close to industries; and (5) midtown urban BGs, with higher negative exposures than average and less green spaces. Other numbers of classes were tested in order to assess a variety of clustering. We present an approach using statistical factor and cluster analyses techniques, which seem overlooked to assess cumulative exposure in complex environmental settings. Although it cannot be applied directly for risk or health effect assessment, the resulting index can help to identify hot spots of cumulative exposure, to prioritize urban policies or to compare the environmental burden across study areas in an epidemiological framework.

Indexed as

Cluster AnalysisFactor Analysis, StatisticalAir PollutantsEnvironmental ExposureEnvironmental MonitoringFranceHumansIndustryInfantInfant MortalityInfant, NewbornNitrogen DioxideNoiseSocioeconomic FactorsSpatial AnalysisStatistics as TopicAir PollutantsNitrogen Dioxide

Identifiers

PMID25248936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.