Trial reportExperimental brain research2015
Rhythmical bimanual force production: homologous and non-homologous muscles.
Trial report in Experimental brain research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- A novel approach to enhancing limb control in older adults.Experimental brain research · 2015Trial
- Neurophysiological effects of partial gravity on bimanual control: a parabolic flight study.NPJ microgravity · 2026Article
- Bimanual coordination and neuromuscular synchronization in Parkinson's disease and healthy adults.Experimental brain research · 2025Article
- Comparison of contralateral muscle excitation in proximal versus distal muscles in the upper extremities.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025Article
- Article
- The effect of inherent and incidental constraints on bimanual and social coordination.Experimental brain research · 2021Article
- The Influence of Altered-Gravity on Bimanual Coordination: Retention and Transfer.Frontiers in physiology · 2021Article
- Bilateral Interference in Motor Performance in Homologous vs. Non-homologous Proximal and Distal Effectors.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
- Accessing interpersonal and intrapersonal coordination dynamics.Experimental brain research · 2020Article
- Response biases: the influence of the contralateral limb and head position.Experimental brain research · 2019Article
- Bimanual coordination and the intermittency of visual information in isometric force tracking.Experimental brain research · 2016Article
- Perception and action influences on discrete and reciprocal bimanual coordination.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2016Review
- Bimanual force control: cooperation and interference?Psychological research · 2016Article
- Symmetrical and asymmetrical influences on force production in 1:2 and 2:1 bimanual force coordination tasks.Experimental brain research · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The experiment was designed to determine participants' ability to coordinate a bimanual multifrequency pattern of isometric forces using homologous or non-homologous muscles. Lissajous feedback was provided to reduce perceptual and attentional constraints. The primary purpose was to determine whether the activation of homologous and non-homologous muscles resulted in different patterns of distortions in the left limb forces that are related to the forces produced by the right limb. The task was to rhythmically produce a 1:2 pattern of isometric forces by exerting isometric forces on the left side force transducer with the left arm that was coordinated with the pattern of isometric forces produced on the right side force transducer with the right arm. The results indicated that participants were able to 'tune-in' a 1:2 coordination patterns using homologous (triceps muscles of the left and right limbs) and using non-homologous muscles (biceps left limb and triceps right limb) when provided Lissajous feedback. However, distinct but consistent and identifiable distortions in the left limb force traces were observed for both the homologous and non-homologous tasks. For the homologous task, the interference occurred in the left limb when the right limb was initiating and releasing force. For the non-homologous task, the interference in the left limb force occurred only when the right limb was releasing force. In both conditions, the interference appeared to continue from the point of force initiation and/or release to peak force velocity. The overall results are consistent with the notion that neural crosstalk manifests differently during the coordination of the limbs depending upon whether homologous or non-homologous muscles are activated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.