Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25248714›Full record

ReviewZhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer2014

[Immunohistochemical detections of EGFR mutations in NSCLC].

Chang Liu, Dongbo Xu, Diansheng Zhong

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chang LiuDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin 300052, China.
Dongbo XuDepartment of Pathology, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300070, China.
Diansheng ZhongDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin 300052, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, it has been well known that non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with mutations of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) response better to EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment. Although DNA-based assays (e.g. DNA sequencing) are the most frequently used and a relatively reliable method to detect EGFR mutations, they are complex, time-consuming and relatively expensive for routine use in clinical laboratories, besides they require high quality tumor samples. In contrast, the immunohistochemistry (IHC) methods make up fully for the above shortcomings and can serve as screening tests for EGFR mutations. However, there are many factors that can influence the results of IHC methods, such as different staining procedures, different antigen retrieval solutions and different sets of criteria, etc. Thus the IHC methods for detecting EGFR mutations have not been widely used in clinic and only in the research stage. This article reviews the use of IHC methods by different researchers and further discusses how to make the IHC methods work best for the detection of EGFR mutations.

Indexed as

MutationCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungDNA Mutational AnalysisErbB ReceptorsHumansImmunohistochemistryLung NeoplasmsErbB Receptors

Identifiers

PMID25248714
PMCPMC6000510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.