ArticleMolecular genetics and genomics : MGG2015
Discriminating between deleterious and neutral non-frameshifting indels based on protein interaction networks and hybrid properties.
Article in Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- SHINE: protein language model-based pathogenicity prediction for short inframe insertion and deletion variants.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Identification and Analysis of Glioblastoma Biomarkers Based on Single Cell Sequencing.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020Article
- Identification and Analysis of the Blood lncRNA Signature for Liver Cirrhosis and Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Frontiers in genetics · 2020Article
- The Methylation Pattern for Knee and Hip Osteoarthritis.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2020Article
- Pathogenicity and functional impact of non-frameshifting insertion/deletion variation in the human genome.PLoS computational biology · 2019Article
- Identification of the copy number variant biomarkers for breast cancer subtypes.Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG · 2019Article
- Identifying Microbiota Signature and Functional Rules Associated With Bacterial Subtypes in Human Intestine.Frontiers in genetics · 2019Article
- The blood transcriptional signature for active and latent tuberculosis.Infection and drug resistance · 2019Article
- The Gene Expression Biomarkers for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Interstitial Lung Disease.Frontiers in genetics · 2019Article
- The transcriptome difference between colorectal tumor and normal tissues revealed by single-cell sequencing.Journal of Cancer · 2019Article
- Cross talk of chromosome instability, CpG island methylator phenotype and mismatch repair in colorectal cancer.Oncology letters · 2018Article
- RFAmyloid: A Web Server for Predicting Amyloid Proteins.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018Article
- Identification and Analysis of Blood Gene Expression Signature for Osteoarthritis With Advanced Feature Selection Methods.Frontiers in genetics · 2018Article
- Identification of tumor-educated platelet biomarkers of non-small-cell lung cancer.OncoTargets and therapy · 2018Article
- Identification of the predictive genes for the response of colorectal cancer patients to FOLFOX therapy.OncoTargets and therapy · 2018Article
- Genetic differences among ethnic groups.BMC genomics · 2015Article
- Computational approaches to study the effects of small genomic variations.Journal of molecular modeling · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
More than ten thousand coding variants are contained in each human genome; however, our knowledge of the way genetic variants underlie phenotypic differences is far from complete. Small insertions and deletions (indels) are one of the most common types of human genetic variants, and indels play a significant role in human inherited disease. To date, we still lack a comprehensive understanding of how indels cause diseases. Therefore, identification and analysis of such deleterious variants is a key challenge and has been of great interest in the current research in genome biology. Increasing numbers of computational methods have been developed for discriminating between deleterious indels and neutral indels. However, most of the existing methods are based on traditional sequential or structural features, which cannot completely explain the association between indels and the resulting induced inherited disease. In this study, we establish a novel method to predict deleterious non-frameshifting indels based on features extracted from both protein interaction networks and traditional hybrid properties. Each indel was coded by 1,246 features. Using the maximum relevance minimum redundancy method and the incremental feature selection method, we obtained an optimal feature set containing 42 features, of which 21 features were derived from protein interaction networks. Based on the optimal feature set, an 88 % accuracy and a 0.76 MCC value were achieved by a Random Forest as evaluated by the Jackknife cross-validation test. This method outperformed existing methods of predicting deleterious indels, and can be applied in practice for deleterious non-frameshifting indel predictions in genome research. The analysis of the optimal features selected in the model revealed that network interactions play more important roles and could be informative for better illustrating an indel's function and disease associations than traditional sequential or structural features. These results could shed some light on the genetic basis of human genetic variations and human inherited diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.