Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25248612›Full record

ArticleJournal of dental research2014

Construction of monomer-free, highly crosslinked, water-compatible polymers.

E A Dailing, S H Lewis, M D Barros, J W Stansbury

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of dental research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

E A DailingDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA.
S H LewisDepartment of Craniofacial Biology, School of Dental Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA.
M D BarrosDepartment of Craniofacial Biology, School of Dental Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA.
J W StansburyDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA Department of Craniofacial Biology, School of Dental Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA Jeffrey.Stansbury@ucdenver.edu.
University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus · USUniversity of Colorado Boulder · USUniversity of Colorado Denver · US

Funding

Monomers and nanogel to improve adhesive resin structural integrity/durabilityR01DE023197 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI STANSBURY, JEFFREY W. · 2013 to 2017
$1.8M
NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE023197NIDCR NIH HHS R01DE023197
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polymeric dental adhesives require the formation of densely crosslinked network structures to best ensure mechanical strength and durability in clinical service. Monomeric precursors to these materials typically consist of mixtures of hydrophilic and hydrophobic components that potentially undergo phase separation in the presence of low concentrations of water, which is detrimental to material performance and has motivated significant investigation into formulations that reduce this effect. We have investigated an approach to network formation based on nanogels that are dispersed in inert solvent and directly polymerized into crosslinked polymers. Monomers of various hydrophilic or hydrophobic characteristics were copolymerized into particulate nanogels bearing internal and external polymerizable functionality. Nanogel dispersions were stable at high concentrations in acetone or, with some exceptions, in water and produced networks with a wide range of mechanical properties. Networks formed rapidly upon light activation and reached high conversion with extremely low volumetric shrinkage. Prepolymerizing monomers into reactive nanostructures significantly changes how hydrophobic materials respond to water compared with networks obtained from polymerizations involving free monomer. The modulus of fully hydrated networks formed solely from nanogels was shown to equal or exceed the modulus in the dry state for networks based on nanogels containing a hydrophobic dimethacrylate and hydrophilic monomethacrylate, a result that was not observed in a hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) homopolymer or in networks formed from nanogels copolymerized with HEMA. These results highlight the unique approach to network development from nanoscale precursors and properties that have direct implications in functional dental materials.

Indexed as

AcetoneBiocompatible MaterialsButanonesDental MaterialsElastic ModulusGelsHumansHydrophobic and Hydrophilic InteractionsIsocyanatesMaterials TestingMercaptoethanolMethacrylatesNanostructuresNitrilesPliabilityPolyethylene Glycols2,2-bis-(4-(2-methacryloxyethoxy)phenyl)propane2-isocyanatoethyl methacrylateAcetoneazobis(isobutyronitrile)Biocompatible MaterialsButanonesDental MaterialsGelshydroxyethyl methacrylateIsocyanatesMercaptoethanolMethacrylatesmethylethyl ketoneNitrilesPolyethylene GlycolsPolymersPolymethacrylic Acidstetraethyleneglycol dimethacrylateWateradhesive resinhydrophilicnanogelphase separationphotopolymerizationpolymer networks

Identifiers

PMID25248612
PMCPMC4237639
OpenAlexW2148435946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.