Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25248497›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2014

A cluster randomised controlled trial of a brief couple-focused psychoeducational intervention to prevent common postnatal mental disorders among women: study protocol.

Heather Rowe, Karen Wynter, Paula Lorgelly, Lisa H Amir, Sanjeeva Ranasinha, Jenny Proimos, Warren Cann, Harriet Hiscock, Jordana Bayer, Joanna Burns and 3 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Heather RoweJean Hailes Research Unit, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Karen WynterJean Hailes Research Unit, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Paula LorgellyFaculty of Business and Economics, Centre for Health Economics, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Lisa H AmirJudith Lumley Centre, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Sanjeeva RanasinhaMonash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Jenny ProimosDepartment of Education and Early Childhood Development, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Warren CannParenting Research Centre, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Harriet HiscockCentre for Community Child Health, The Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Jordana BayerSchool of Psychology, Faculty of Science, Technology and Engineering, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia.
Joanna BurnsJean Hailes Research Unit, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Jemimah RideFaculty of Business and Economics, Centre for Health Economics, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Irene BobevskiJean Hailes Research Unit, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Jane FisherJean Hailes Research Unit, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPostnatal common mental disorders among women are an important public health problem internationally. Interventions to prevent postnatal depression have had limited success. What Were We Thinking (WWWT) is a structured, gender-informed, psychoeducational group programme for parents and their first infant that addresses two modifiable risks to postnatal mental health. This paper describes the protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial to test the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of WWWT when implemented in usual primary care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: 48 maternal and child health (MCH) centres from six diverse Local Government Areas, in Victoria, Australia are randomly allocated to the intervention group (usual care plus WWWT) or the control group (usual care). The required sample size is 184 women in each group. English-speaking primiparous women receiving postpartum healthcare in participating MCH centres complete two computer-assisted telephone interviews: baseline at 4 weeks and outcome at 6 months postpartum. Women attending intervention MCH centres are invited to attend WWWT in addition to usual care. The primary outcome is meeting Diagnostic and Statistical Manual-IV (DSM-IV) diagnostic criteria for major depressive episode; generalised anxiety disorder; panic disorder with or without agoraphobia, agoraphobia with or without panic, social phobia, adult separation anxiety or adjustment disorder with depressed mood, anxiety or mixed depressed mood and anxiety within the past 30 days at 6 months postpartum. Secondary outcomes are self-rated general and emotional health, infant sleep problems, method of infant feeding, quality of mother-infant relationship and intimate partner relationship, and healthcare costs and outcomes. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Approval to conduct the study has been granted. A comprehensive dissemination plan has been devised. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12613000506796. UTN: U1111-1125-8208.

Indexed as

AdultCost-Benefit AnalysisCouples TherapyDepression, PostpartumFemaleHumansPsychotherapy, BriefTreatment OutcomeVictoriaMENTAL HEALTHPREVENTIVE MEDICINEPRIMARY CAREPUBLIC HEALTH

Identifiers

PMID25248497
PMCPMC4173107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.