Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25248401›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2015

A clinical and genetic analysis of multiple primary cancer referrals to genetics services.

James Whitworth, Jon Hoffman, Cyril Chapman, Kai Ren Ong, Fiona Lalloo, D Gareth Evans, Eamonn R Maher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Multiple Primary Cancers in Patients Undergoing Tumor-Normal Sequencing Define Novel Associations.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Molecular karyotyping and gene expression analysis in childhood cancer patients.Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany) · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

James Whitworth1] Centre for Rare Diseases and Personalised Medicine, School of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK [2] West Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's Hospital NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Jon HoffmanWest Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's Hospital NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Cyril ChapmanWest Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's Hospital NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Kai Ren OngWest Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's Hospital NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Fiona LallooManchester centre for genomic medicine, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Trust, Manchester, UK.
D Gareth EvansManchester centre for genomic medicine, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Trust, Manchester, UK.
Eamonn R Maher1] Centre for Rare Diseases and Personalised Medicine, School of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK [2] Department of Medical Genetics, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple primary malignant tumours (MPMT) are frequently taken as an indicator of potential inherited cancer susceptibility and occur at appreciable frequency both among unselected cancer patients and, particularly, among referrals to cancer genetics services. However, there is a paucity of information on the clinical genetic evaluation of cohorts of MPMT patients representing a variety of tumour types. We ascertained a referral-based series of MPMT cases and describe the patterns of tumours observed. Service-based molecular genetic testing had demonstrated a pathogenic germline variant in an inherited cancer gene in fewer than one in four unselected referrals. To assess for evidence of thus far unidentified variants in those who tested negative, comparisons were made with those who tested positive. This revealed considerable overlap between the two groups with respect to clinical characteristics indicative of an inherited cancer syndrome. We therefore proceeded to test a subset of unexplained MPMT cases (n=62) for pathogenic germline variants in TP53 and PTEN but none were detected. Individuals with MPMT may receive negative genetic test results for a number of reasons, which are discussed. Many of these may be addressed by the increasing application of next generation sequencing techniques such as inherited cancer gene panels.

Indexed as

Genetic TestingReferral and ConsultationDNA Mismatch RepairExonsFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGerm-Line MutationHumansMaleNeoplasms, Multiple PrimaryPTEN PhosphohydrolaseSequence Analysis, DNATumor Suppressor Protein p53PTEN PhosphohydrolasePTEN protein, humanTumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID25248401
PMCPMC4402633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.