Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25248371›Full record

Trial reportTrials2014

Parenteral nutrition at the palliative phase of advanced cancer: the ALIM-K study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Lionel Pazart, Elodie Cretin, Ghislain Grodard, Cecile Cornet, Florence Mathieu-Nicot, Franck Bonnetain, Mariette Mercier, Patrice Cuynet, Carole Bouleuc, Regis Aubry and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02151214 (Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Study Evaluating the Efficacy of Parenteral Nutrition on the Quality of Life and Overall Survival in Patients in the Palliative Phase of Cancer.), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02151214 nacompletednot on this map

Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Study Evaluating the Efficacy of Parenteral Nutrition on the Quality of Life and Overall Survival in Patients in the Palliative Phase of Cancer.

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de BesanconRan2012 to 2017Enrolled106ConditionsNutrition Aspect of Cancer, End Stage CancerArmsParenteral nutrition
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Nutrition support in hospitalised adults at nutritional risk.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lionel PazartInserm CIC 1431, CHRU de Besançon, Besançon, France. lionel.pazart@gmail.com.
Elodie Cretin
Ghislain Grodard
Cecile Cornet
Florence Mathieu-Nicot
Franck Bonnetain
Mariette Mercier
Patrice Cuynet
Carole Bouleuc
Regis Aubry
ALIM-K study investigational group
Inserm · FRMethodology and Quality of Life Unit in Oncology · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMalnutrition is a common complication in patients at the palliative stage of cancer. During the curative phase of cancer, optimal enteral or parenteral nutrition intake can reduce morbidity and mortality, and improve quality of life. When the main goal of treatment becomes palliative, introduction of artificial nutrition is controversial. Although scientific societies do not recommend the introduction of artificial nutrition in all cases of malnutrition, especially in hypophagic patients if their life expectancy is shorter than 2 months, considerable differences in the use of parenteral nutrition in nonsurgical oncology practice are noted around the world. One explanation is a paucity of well-conducted randomized controlled trials in these situations, and consequently, the risk/benefit ratio of parenteral nutrition and its impact on quality of life in palliative care remains uncertain. METHODS/

designThe ALIM-K study is a French national multicenter randomized controlled trial designed to evaluate the effectiveness of parenteral nutrition, versus an exclusive oral-feeding supply, on the quality of life of malnourished patients who have a functional digestive tube and who are at the palliative phase of advanced cancer with a life expectancy of more than 2 months. DISCUSSION: This article presents the methodologic options chosen for our study, and in particular, the choice of the Zelen method of randomization, the definition of the main end point (quality of life), the choice of comparator (oral feeding), and the inclusion criteria (life expectancy of more than 2 months), which are all critical points in building a randomized controlled trial in the setting of palliative care.

trial registrationThis study was registered with the clinical trials database ClinicalTrials.gov on May 27, 2014, under the number NCT02151214.

Indexed as

Parenteral NutritionResearch DesignClinical ProtocolsFranceHumansLife ExpectancyMalnutritionNeoplasmsNeoplasm StagingPalliative CareQuality of LifeTime FactorsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID25248371
PMCPMC4247729
OpenAlexW2100240082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.