Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25248302›Full record

ArticleAnnals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine2015

Predictors of adherence to glaucoma treatment in a multisite study.

Paul F Cook, Sarah J Schmiege, Steven L Mansberger, Jeffrey Kammer, Timothy Fitzgerald, Malik Y Kahook

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01409421 (An Assessment of the Impact of Motivational Interviewing Via Glaucoma Educator on Glaucoma Treatment Adherence and Persistence), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01409421 nacompletednot on this map

An Assessment of the Impact of Motivational Interviewing Via Glaucoma Educator on Glaucoma Treatment Adherence and Persistence

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Colorado, DenverRan2011 to 2013Enrolled201ConditionsPrimary Open Angle GlaucomaArmsmotivational interviewing, three phone calls to remind patients to take their eye drops
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Observational
  17. Reminder systems, not education, improve glaucoma adherence: a comment on Cook et al.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2015
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Paul F CookUniversity of Colorado College of Nursing, University of Colorado, Campus Box C288-04, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA, paul.cook@ucdenver.edu.
Sarah J Schmiege
Steven L Mansberger
Jeffrey Kammer
Timothy Fitzgerald
Malik Y Kahook
University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus · USLegacy Health · USThe White House · USVanderbilt Health · US

Funding

CTSA INFRASTRUCTURE FOR PEDIATRIC RESEARCHUL1RR025780 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI SOKOL, RONALD J. · 2008 to 2011
$61.3M
Colorado Clinical and Translational Sciences InstituteUL1TR001082 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI SOKOL, RONALD J. · 2013 to 2017
$48.0M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001082NCRR NIH HHS 1UL1RR025780-01NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR025780
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPoor adherence hinders glaucoma treatment. Studies have identified demographic and clinical predictors of adherence but fewer psychological variables. PURPOSE: We examined predictors from four health behavior theories and past research.

methodsIn the baseline phase of a three-site adherence study, before any intervention, 201 participants used electronic Medication Event Monitoring System (MEMS) bottles to monitor eyedrop use for 2 months, and completed questionnaires including self-reported adherence.

resultsMEMS showed 79% adherence and self-report 94% (0.5-1.5 missed weekly doses), but they correlated only r(s) = 0.31. Self-efficacy, motivation, dose frequency, and nonminority race/ethnicity predicted 35% of variance in MEMS. Cues to action, self-efficacy, and intention predicted 20% of variance in self-reported adherence.

conclusionsSelf-efficacy, motivation, intention, cues to action, dose frequency, and race/ethnicity each independently predicted adherence. Predictors from all theories were supported in bivariate analyses, but additional study is needed. Researchers and clinicians should consider psychological predictors of adherence. (ClinicalTrials.gov ID# NCT01409421.).

Indexed as

Health BehaviorHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeMedication AdherenceAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleGlaucomaHumansMaleMiddle AgedMotivationSelf EfficacySelf ReportYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID25248302
PMCPMC4336606
OpenAlexW2056724006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.