ArticlePloS one2014
Cell substratum adhesion during early development of Dictyostelium discoideum.
Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- The RNA-binding protein RNP1A is essential and interacts with contractility kit proteins to facilitate cell mechanics.Journal of cell science · 2026Article
- A Microfluidic Design for Quantitative Measurements of Shear Stress-Dependent Adhesion and Motion ofBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Fibronectin induces a transition from amoeboid to a fan morphology and modifies migration in Entamoeba histolytica.PLoS pathogens · 2024Article
- Metal-Induced Energy Transfer (MIET) for Live-Cell Imaging with Fluorescent Proteins.ACS nano · 2023Article
- Adhesion ofFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022Review
- An evolutionary and physiological perspective on cell-substrate adhesion machinery for cell migration.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022Review
- Mfsd8 Modulates Growth and the Early Stages of Multicellular Development inFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022Article
- Coupling traction force patterns and actomyosin wave dynamics reveals mechanics of cell motion.Molecular systems biology · 2021Article
- Tailored nanotopography of photocurable composites for control of cell migration.RSC advances · 2021Article
- Article
- Article
- A telomerase with novel non-canonical roles: TERT controls cellular aggregation and tissue size in Dictyostelium.PLoS genetics · 2019Article
- Shear force-based genetic screen reveals negative regulators of cell adhesion and protrusive activity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017Article
- Aberrant adhesion impacts early development in a Dictyostelium model for juvenile neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis.Cell adhesion & migration · 2017Article
- Progress and perspectives in signal transduction, actin dynamics, and movement at the cell and tissue level: lessons fromInterface focus · 2016Review
- Genetic control of morphogenesis in Dictyostelium.Developmental biology · 2015Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Vegetative and developed amoebae of Dictyostelium discoideum gain traction and move rapidly on a wide range of substrata without forming focal adhesions. We used two independent assays to quantify cell-substrate adhesion in mutants and in wild-type cells as a function of development. Using a microfluidic device that generates a range of hydrodynamic shear stress, we found that substratum adhesion decreases at least 10 fold during the first 6 hr of development of wild type cells. This result was confirmed using a single-cell assay in which cells were attached to the cantilever of an atomic force probe and allowed to adhere to untreated glass surfaces before being retracted. Both of these assays showed that the decrease in substratum adhesion was dependent on the cAMP receptor CAR1 which triggers development. Vegetative cells missing talin as the result of a mutation in talA exhibited slightly reduced adhesive properties compared to vegetative wild-type cells. In sharp contrast to wild-type cells, however, these talA mutant cells did not show further reduction of adhesion during development such that after 5 hr of development they were significantly more adhesive than developed wild type cells. In addition, both assays showed that substrate adhesion was reduced in 0 hr cells when the actin cytoskeleton was disrupted by latrunculin. Consistent with previous observations, substrate adhesion was also reduced in 0 hr cells lacking the membrane proteins SadA or SibA as the result of mutations in sadA or sibA. However, there was no difference in the adhesion properties between wild type AX3 cells and these mutant cells after 6 hr of development, suggesting that neither SibA nor SadA play an essential role in substratum adhesion during aggregation. Our results provide a quantitative framework for further studies of cell substratum adhesion in Dictyostelium.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.