Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25247423›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2014

Variable combinations of specific ephrin ligand/Eph receptor pairs control embryonic tissue separation.

Nazanin Rohani, Andrea Parmeggiani, Rudolf Winklbauer, François Fagotto

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Adhesion-Based Self-Organization in Tissue Patterning.Annual review of cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Segmentation and patterning of the vertebrate hindbrain.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Approaches to Manipulate Ephrin-A:EphA Forward Signaling Pathway.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Nazanin RohaniDepartment of Biology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Andrea ParmeggianiComplex Systems and Non Linear Phenomena, L2C-UMR 5221 CNRS-UM2, Montpellier, France; Biological Physics and Systems Biology, DIMNP-UMR 5235 CNRS-UM2 et 1, Montpellier, France.
Rudolf WinklbauerDepartment of Cell and Systems Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
François FagottoDepartment of Biology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
McGill University · CALaboratoire Charles Coulomb · FRUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research MOP-130350Canadian Institutes of Health Research MOP-53075
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ephrins and Eph receptors are involved in the establishment of vertebrate tissue boundaries. The complexity of the system is puzzling, however in many instances, tissues express multiple ephrins and Ephs on both sides of the boundary, a situation that should in principle cause repulsion between cells within each tissue. Although co-expression of ephrins and Eph receptors is widespread in embryonic tissues, neurons, and cancer cells, it is still unresolved how the respective signals are integrated into a coherent output. We present a simple explanation for the confinement of repulsion to the tissue interface: Using the dorsal ectoderm-mesoderm boundary of the Xenopus embryo as a model, we identify selective functional interactions between ephrin-Eph pairs that are expressed in partial complementary patterns. The combined repulsive signals add up to be strongest across the boundary, where they reach sufficient intensity to trigger cell detachments. The process can be largely explained using a simple model based exclusively on relative ephrin and Eph concentrations and binding affinities. We generalize these findings for the ventral ectoderm-mesoderm boundary and the notochord boundary, both of which appear to function on the same principles. These results provide a paradigm for how developmental systems may integrate multiple cues to generate discrete local outcomes.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalAnimalsEctodermEmbryo, NonmammalianEphrin-B1Ephrin-B2Ephrin-B3MesodermMiceMorphogenesisNotochordReceptor, EphA4Receptor, EphB2Receptor, EphB4Recombinant ProteinsSignal TransductionEphrin-B1Ephrin-B2Ephrin-B3Receptor, EphA4Receptor, EphB2Receptor, EphB4Recombinant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID25247423
PMCPMC4172438
OpenAlexW2006484459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.