Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25247180›Full record

ArticleBioMed research international2014

Study of the polycarbonate-urethane/metal contact in different positions during gait cycle.

Sergio Gabarre, Antonio Herrera, Jesús Mateo, Elena Ibarz, Antonio Lobo-Escolar, Luis Gracia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioMed research international, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Comparison of wear on articular cartilage from polycarbonate-urethane and other implant biomaterials.Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sergio GabarreDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Engineering and Architecture School, University of Zaragoza, María de Luna 3, 50018 Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2934-1525
Antonio HerreraDepartment of Surgery, Medicine School, University of Zaragoza, Domingo Miral s/n, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain ; Aragón Health Sciences Institute, Avenida San Juan Bosco 13, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain.
Jesús MateoDepartment of Surgery, Medicine School, University of Zaragoza, Domingo Miral s/n, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain ; Aragón Health Sciences Institute, Avenida San Juan Bosco 13, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain ; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Miguel Servet University Hospital, Avenida Isabel la Católica 3, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain.
Elena IbarzDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Engineering and Architecture School, University of Zaragoza, María de Luna 3, 50018 Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0785-4132
Antonio Lobo-EscolarDepartment of Surgery, Medicine School, University of Zaragoza, Domingo Miral s/n, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain ; Aragón Health Sciences Institute, Avenida San Juan Bosco 13, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain ; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Miguel Servet University Hospital, Avenida Isabel la Católica 3, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain.
Luis GraciaDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Engineering and Architecture School, University of Zaragoza, María de Luna 3, 50018 Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7944-9625

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nowadays, a growing number of young and more active patients receive hip replacement. More strenuous activities in such patients involve higher friction and wear rates, with friction on the bearing surface being crucial to ensure arthroplasty survival in the long term. Over the last years, the polycarbonate-urethane has offered a feasible alternative to conventional bearings. A finite element model of a healthy hip joint was developed and adjusted to three gait phases (heel strike, mid-stance, and toe-off), serving as a benchmark for the assessment of the results of joint replacement model. Three equivalent models were made with the polycarbonate-urethane Tribofit system implanted, one for each of the three gait phases, after reproducing a virtual surgery over the respective healthy models. Standard body-weight loads were considered: 230% body-weight toe-off, 275% body-weight mid-stance, and 350% body-weight heel strike. Contact pressures were obtained for the different models. When comparing the results corresponding to the healthy model to polycarbonate-urethane joint, contact areas are similar and so contact pressures are within a narrower value range. In conclusion, polycarbonate-urethane characteristics are similar to those of the joint cartilage. So, it is a favorable alternative to traditional bearing surfaces in total hip arthroplasty, especially in young patients.

Indexed as

GaitHip ProsthesisModels, BiologicalWeight-BearingAgedComputer SimulationEquipment Failure AnalysisFrictionHip JointHumansMaleMetalsPolycarboxylate CementProsthesis DesignRange of Motion, ArticularStress, MechanicalMetalspolycarbonatePolycarboxylate CementUrethane

Identifiers

PMID25247180
PMCPMC4163484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.