Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25247133›Full record

ArticleBeilstein journal of nanotechnology2014

Hydrophobic interaction governs unspecific adhesion of staphylococci: a single cell force spectroscopy study.

Nicolas Thewes, Peter Loskill, Philipp Jung, Henrik Peisker, Markus Bischoff, Mathias Herrmann, Karin Jacobs

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Beilstein journal of nanotechnology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. ACS omega · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Drying of Soft Colloidal Films.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Using Knock-Out Mutants to Investigate the Adhesion ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  14. Surface Properties ofMicroorganisms · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Virulence · 2020
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Nicolas ThewesExperimental Physics, Campus E2 9, Saarland University, D-66123 Saarbrücken, Germany.
Peter LoskillExperimental Physics, Campus E2 9, Saarland University, D-66123 Saarbrücken, Germany ; Present address: Dept. of Bioengineering and California Institute for Quantitative Biosciences (QB3), University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720, USA.
Philipp JungInstitute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, Saarland University, D-66421 Homburg/Saar, Germany.
Henrik PeiskerInstitute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, Saarland University, D-66421 Homburg/Saar, Germany.
Markus BischoffInstitute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, Saarland University, D-66421 Homburg/Saar, Germany.
Mathias HerrmannInstitute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, Saarland University, D-66421 Homburg/Saar, Germany.
Karin JacobsExperimental Physics, Campus E2 9, Saarland University, D-66123 Saarbrücken, Germany.
Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene · DESaarland University · DEQB3 · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unspecific adhesion of bacteria is usually the first step in the formation of biofilms on abiotic surfaces, yet it is unclear up to now which forces are governing this process. Alongside long-ranged van der Waals and electrostatic forces, short-ranged hydrophobic interaction plays an important role. To characterize the forces involved during approach and retraction of an individual bacterium to and from a surface, single cell force spectroscopy is applied: A single cell of the apathogenic species Staphylococcus carnosus isolate TM300 is used as bacterial probe. With the exact same bacterium, hydrophobic and hydrophilic surfaces can be probed and compared. We find that as far as 50 nm from the surface, attractive forces can already be recorded, an indication of the involvement of long-ranged forces. Yet, comparing the surfaces of different surface energy, our results corroborate the model that large, bacterial cell wall proteins are responsible for adhesion, and that their interplay with the short-ranged hydrophobic interaction of the involved surfaces is mainly responsible for adhesion. The ostensibly long range of the attraction is a result of the large size of the cell wall proteins, searching for contact via hydrophobic interaction. The model also explains the strong (weak) adhesion of S. carnosus to hydrophobic (hydrophilic) surfaces.

Indexed as

atomic force microscopy (AFM)force spectroscopyhydrophobic interactionsingle cellStaphylococcus carnosus

Identifiers

PMID25247133
PMCPMC4168904
OpenAlexW2082097856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.