Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25246855›Full record

ArticleCost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E2014

Guidance on priority setting in health care (GPS-Health): the inclusion of equity criteria not captured by cost-effectiveness analysis.

Ole F Norheim, Rob Baltussen, Mira Johri, Dan Chisholm, Erik Nord, DanW Brock, Per Carlsson, Richard Cookson, Norman Daniels, Marion Danis and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 90 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
90citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

90 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Quality-adjusted life expectancy norms for the Canadian population using EQ-5D-5L and SF-6Dv2.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Frameworks to support evidence-informed decision-making in public health and infectious disease prevention and control: a scoping review.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Impact of Long COVID on productivity and informal caregiving.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

30 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Ole F NorheimDepartment of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, PB 7800, 5020 Bergen, Norway.
Rob BaltussenNijmegen International Centre for Health Systems Research and Education (NICHE), Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Mira JohriCentre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), Québec, Canada.
Dan ChisholmDepartment of Health Systems Financing, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Erik NordNorwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
DanW BrockHarvard Medical School, Harvard University, Cambridge, USA.
Per CarlssonNational Centre for Priority Setting in Health Care, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Richard CooksonCentre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK.
Norman DanielsHarvard School of Public Health, Harvard University, Cambridge, USA.
Marion DanisSection on Ethics and Health Policy, NIH Clinical Centre, Bethesda, USA.
Marc FleurbaeyWoodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University, Princeton, USA.
Kjell A JohanssonDepartment of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, PB 7800, 5020 Bergen, Norway.
Lydia KapiririDepartment of Health, Aging, and Society, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Peter LittlejohnsDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health Sciences, Division of Health and Social Care Research, King's College London, Previous affiliation the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), London, England, UK.
Thomas MbeeliMinistry of Health and Social Services, Windhoek, Namibia.
Krishna D RaoPublic Health Foundation of India, New Delhi, India.
Tessa Tan-Torres EdejerCentre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), Québec, Canada.
Dan WiklerHarvard School of Public Health, Harvard University, Cambridge, USA.

Funding

Department of Health SRF-2013-06-015World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This Guidance for Priority Setting in Health Care (GPS-Health), initiated by the World Health Organization, offers a comprehensive map of equity criteria that are relevant to health care priority setting and should be considered in addition to cost-effectiveness analysis. The guidance, in the form of a checklist, is especially targeted at decision makers who set priorities at national and sub-national levels, and those who interpret findings from cost-effectiveness analysis. It is also targeted at researchers conducting cost-effectiveness analysis to improve reporting of their results in the light of these other criteria. THE GUIDANCE WAS DEVELOP THROUGH A SERIES OF EXPERT CONSULTATION MEETINGS AND INVOLVED THREE STEPS: i) methods and normative concepts were identified through a systematic review; ii) the review findings were critically assessed in the expert consultation meetings which resulted in a draft checklist of normative criteria; iii) the checklist was validated though an extensive hearing process with input from a range of relevant stakeholders. The GPS-Health incorporates criteria related to the disease an intervention targets (severity of disease, capacity to benefit, and past health loss); characteristics of social groups an intervention targets (socioeconomic status, area of living, gender; race, ethnicity, religion and sexual orientation); and non-health consequences of an intervention (financial protection, economic productivity, and care for others).

Indexed as

Cost-effectivenessEquityPopulation healthPriority settingResource allocation

Identifiers

PMID25246855
PMCPMC4171087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.