Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25246558›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2014

Enhanced natural killer-cell and T-cell responses to influenza A virus during pregnancy.

Alexander W Kay, Julia Fukuyama, Natali Aziz, Cornelia L Dekker, Sally Mackey, Gary E Swan, Mark M Davis, Susan Holmes, Catherine A Blish

4 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 65 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03022396 phase4completednot on this map

Protective Mechanisms Against a Pandemic Respiratory Virus: B- Cell, T-cell, and General Immune Response to Seasonal Influenza Vaccine. Year 2, 2010

TypeinterventionalSponsorStanford UniversityRan2010 to 2011Enrolled82ConditionsInfluenzaArmsHigh Dose Fluzone® (intramuscular), Fluzone® (intramuscular)
NCT03022422 phase4completednot on this map

Protective Mechanisms Against a Pandemic Respiratory Virus: B-Cell, T-cell, and General Immune Response to Seasonal Influenza Vaccine. Year 3, 2011

TypeinterventionalSponsorStanford UniversityRan2011 to 2011Enrolled63ConditionsInfluenzaArmsTIV, High-Dose TIV
NCT03022435 phase4completednot on this map

Protective Mechanisms Against a Pandemic Respiratory Virus: B-cell, T-cell, and General Immune Response to Seasonal Influenza Vaccine. Year 4, 2012

TypeinterventionalSponsorStanford UniversityRan2012 to 2013Enrolled22ConditionsInfluenzaArmsTIV, High-Dose TIV, LAIV
NCT03196245 terminatednot on this map

NK Cell Mediated Influenza Immunity During Pregnancy

TypeobservationalSponsorStanford UniversityRan2012 to 2019Enrolled94ConditionsPregnancy Related, Influenza, HumanArmsThere is no intervention.
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Alexander W KayDepartments of Pediatrics, cblish@stanford.edu mmdavis@stanford.edu awkay@stanford.edu.
Julia FukuyamaStatistics.
Natali AzizObstetrics and Gynecology.
Cornelia L DekkerDepartments of Pediatrics.
Sally MackeyDepartments of Pediatrics.
Gary E SwanStanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305.
Mark M DavisMicrobiology and Immunology, Immunology, and cblish@stanford.edu mmdavis@stanford.edu awkay@stanford.edu.
Susan HolmesStatistics.
Catherine A BlishImmunology, and Medicine, and cblish@stanford.edu mmdavis@stanford.edu awkay@stanford.edu.
Bipar · FRInteracoustics (Denmark) · DKStanford University · US

Funding

Using a tonsil organoid system to probe conditions for the induction of protective antibody and T cell responses to influenza.U19AI057229 · NIAID · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Mark Morris Davis · 2003 to 2026
$88.5M
Spectrum Stanford Center for clinical and Translational Research and EducationUL1TR001085 · NCATS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CULLEN, MARK RICHARD, GREENBERG, HARRY BERNARD · 2013 to 2017
$37.1M
Vaccination and infection: indicators of immunological health and responsivenessU19AI090019 · NIAID · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI DAVIS, MARK MORRIS · 2010 to 2015
$17.3M
Stanford Center for Clinical and Translational Education and Research (SCCTER)UL1UL1TR000093 · NCATS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GREENBERG, HARRY BERNARD · 2012 to 2013
$6.5M
Training Grant Pediatric Infectious Diseases: Viral Infections in ChildrenT32AI078896 · NIAID · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MALDONADO, YVONNE A. · 2009 to 2013
$563k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000093NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001085NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI078896NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI78896-05NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI057229NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI090019NIAID NIH HHS U19AI090019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pregnant women experience increased morbidity and mortality after influenza infection, for reasons that are not understood. Although some data suggest that natural killer (NK)- and T-cell responses are suppressed during pregnancy, influenza-specific responses have not been previously evaluated. Thus, we analyzed the responses of women that were pregnant (n = 21) versus those that were not (n = 29) immediately before inactivated influenza vaccination (IIV), 7 d after vaccination, and 6 wk postpartum. Expression of CD107a (a marker of cytolysis) and production of IFN-γ and macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP) 1β were assessed by flow cytometry. Pregnant women had a significantly increased percentage of NK cells producing a MIP-1β response to pH1N1 virus compared with nonpregnant women pre-IIV [median, 6.66 vs. 0.90% (P = 0.0149)] and 7 d post-IIV [median, 11.23 vs. 2.81% (P = 0.004)], indicating a heightened chemokine response in pregnant women that was further enhanced by the vaccination. Pregnant women also exhibited significantly increased T-cell production of MIP-1β and polyfunctionality in NK and T cells to pH1N1 virus pre- and post-IIV. NK- and T-cell polyfunctionality was also enhanced in pregnant women in response to the H3N2 viral strain. In contrast, pregnant women had significantly reduced NK- and T-cell responses to phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate and ionomycin. This type of stimulation led to the conclusion that NK- and T-cell responses during pregnancy are suppressed, but clearly this conclusion is not correct relative to the more biologically relevant assays described here. Robust cellular immune responses to influenza during pregnancy could drive pulmonary inflammation, explaining increased morbidity and mortality.

Indexed as

AdultChemokine CCL4FemaleFlow CytometryHumansImmunity, CellularInfluenza A virusInfluenza A Virus, H1N1 SubtypeInfluenza A Virus, H3N2 SubtypeInfluenza VaccinesInterferon-gammaIonomycinKiller Cells, NaturalLysosomal-Associated Membrane Protein 1Postpartum PeriodPregnancyChemokine CCL4Influenza VaccinesInterferon-gammaIonomycinLysosomal-Associated Membrane Protein 1Tetradecanoylphorbol AcetateVaccines, Inactivated

Identifiers

PMID25246558
PMCPMC4210016
OpenAlexW2017579182

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.