Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25246547›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2014

Neuronal mechanism for acute mechanosensitivity in tactile-foraging waterfowl.

Eve R Schneider, Marco Mastrotto, Willem J Laursen, Vincent P Schulz, Jena B Goodman, Owen H Funk, Patrick G Gallagher, Elena O Gracheva, Sviatoslav N Bagriantsev

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Piezo 1 and Piezo 2 in the Chemosensory Organs of Zebrafish (International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Piezo1: the key regulators in central nervous system diseases.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2024
    Review
  9. The mechanism and potential therapeutic target of piezo channels in pain.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Mechanotransductive receptorFrontiers in molecular biosciences · 2023
    Review
  13. eLife · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The Form and Function of PIEZO2.Annual review of biochemistry · 2021
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eve R SchneiderDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Physiology.
Marco MastrottoDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Physiology, Yale Program in Cellular Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration and Repair.
Willem J LaursenDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Physiology, Yale Program in Cellular Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration and Repair.
Vincent P SchulzDepartment of Pediatrics, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520.
Jena B GoodmanDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Physiology, Yale Program in Cellular Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration and Repair.
Owen H FunkDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Physiology.
Patrick G GallagherDepartment of Pediatrics, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520.
Elena O GrachevaDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Physiology, Yale Program in Cellular Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration and Repair, sviatoslav.bagriantsev@yale.edu elena.gracheva@yale.edu.
Sviatoslav N BagriantsevDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Physiology, sviatoslav.bagriantsev@yale.edu elena.gracheva@yale.edu.
Yale University · US

Funding

Yale University Clinical and Translational Science Award ProgramUL1TR000142 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI SHERWIN, ROBERT S · 2012 to 2015
$31.8M
RESEARCH IN PERINATAL MEDICINET32HD007094 · NICHD · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI GALLAGHER, PATRICK G · 1985 to 2015
$3.6M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000142NHGRI NIH HHS T32HG319810NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD007094NICHD NIH HHS T32HD007094
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Relying almost exclusively on their acute sense of touch, tactile-foraging birds can feed in murky water, but the cellular mechanism is unknown. Mechanical stimuli activate specialized cutaneous end organs in the bill, innervated by trigeminal afferents. We report that trigeminal ganglia (TG) of domestic and wild tactile-foraging ducks exhibit numerical expansion of large-diameter mechanoreceptive neurons expressing the mechano-gated ion channel Piezo2. These features are not found in visually foraging birds. Moreover, in the duck, the expansion of mechanoreceptors occurs at the expense of thermosensors. Direct mechanical stimulation of duck TG neurons evokes high-amplitude depolarizing current with a low threshold of activation, high signal amplification gain, and slow kinetics of inactivation. Together, these factors contribute to efficient conversion of light mechanical stimuli into neuronal excitation. Our results reveal an evolutionary strategy to hone tactile perception in vertebrates at the level of primary afferents.

Indexed as

Feeding BehaviorMechanotransduction, CellularAnimalsDown-RegulationDucksIon Channel GatingIon ChannelsNeuronsSensory ThresholdsThermoreceptorsTouchTrigeminal GanglionTRPM Cation ChannelsTRPV Cation ChannelsUp-RegulationIon ChannelsTRPM Cation ChannelsTRPV Cation ChannelsmechanotransductionPiezo2TRPM8TRPV1

Identifiers

PMID25246547
PMCPMC4205607
OpenAlexW2040069811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.