ReviewJournal of the American Heart Association2014
Clinician's guide to the updated ABCs of cardiovascular disease prevention.
Review in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- The ABCs of cardiovascular disease prevention: communicating what we know in 2026.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2026Review
- The role of coronary artery calcium in allocating pharmacotherapy for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: The ABCs of CAC.Clinical cardiology · 2022Review
- Assessment of the Role of Carotid Atherosclerosis in the Association Between Major Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Ischemic Stroke Subtypes.JAMA network open · 2019Observational
- Organizational Leadership and Adaptive Reserve in Blood Pressure Control: The Heart Health NOW Study.Annals of family medicine · 2018Article
- Effects of Mindfulness-Based Art Therapy on Psychological Symptoms in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease.Journal of Korean medical science · 2018Article
- Correlation between Osteoprotegerin Serum Level and Coronary Calcification Using Coronary Artery Calcium Score in Patient with Moderate-Severe Cardiovascular Risk Factor.The International journal of angiology : official publication of the International College of Angiology, Inc · 2017Article
- Beyond Anthracyclines: Preemptive Management of Cardiovascular Toxicity in the Era of Targeted Agents for Hematologic Malignancies.Current hematologic malignancy reports · 2017Review
- DECADE-pilot: decision aid, action planning, and follow-up support for patients to reduce the 10-year risk of cardiovascular diseases-a protocol of a randomized controlled pilot trial.Pilot and feasibility studies · 2017Article
- Analyzing cardiovascular treatment guidelines application to women and minority populations.SAGE open medicine · 2017Review
- Screening for cardiovascular disease risk and subsequent management in low and middle income countries: challenges and opportunities.Public health reviews · 2015Article
- Balancing Beats and Bleeding: The Evolving Landscape of Atrial Fibrillation and Anticoagulation in the Past Two Decades.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/HemostasisReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To facilitate the guideline-based implementation of treatment recommendations in the ambulatory setting and to encourage participation in the multiple preventive health efforts that exist, we have organized several recent guideline updates into a simple ABCDEF approach. We would remind clinicians that evidence-based medicine is meant to inform recommendations but that synthesis of patient-specific data and use of appropriate clinical judgment in each individual situation is ultimately preferred.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.