ArticleDatabase : the journal of biological databases and curation2014
Hybrid curation of gene-mutation relations combining automated extraction and crowdsourcing.
Article in Database : the journal of biological databases and curation, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Mapping of Crowdsourcing in Health: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2018Pooled it
- Rethinking the production and publication of machine-readable expressions of research findings.Scientific data · 2025Article
- PubChem synonym filtering process using crowdsourcing.Journal of cheminformatics · 2024Article
- CoVEffect: interactive system for mining the effects of SARS-CoV-2 mutations and variants based on deep learning.GigaScience · 2022Article
- Recent advances of automated methods for searching and extracting genomic variant information from biomedical literature.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2021Review
- Applying citizen science to gene, drug and disease relationship extraction from biomedical abstracts.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2020Article
- PubTator central: automated concept annotation for biomedical full text articles.Nucleic acids research · 2019Article
- Translating cancer genomics into precision medicine with artificial intelligence: applications, challenges and future perspectives.Human genetics · 2019Review
- Making the right calls in precision oncology.Nature biotechnology · 2018Article
- Scaling up data curation using deep learning: An application to literature triage in genomic variation resources.PLoS computational biology · 2018Article
- Applications of crowdsourcing in health: an overview.Journal of global health · 2018Review
- Deep learning of mutation-gene-drug relations from the literature.BMC bioinformatics · 2018Article
- tmVar 2.0: integrating genomic variant information from literature with dbSNP and ClinVar for precision medicine.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2018Article
- Recent advances in predicting gene-disease associations.F1000Research · 2017Review
- Text Mining Genotype-Phenotype Relationships from Biomedical Literature for Database Curation and Precision Medicine.PLoS computational biology · 2016Article
- Extraction and analysis of signatures from the Gene Expression Omnibus by the crowd.Nature communications · 2016Article
- Text mining for precision medicine: automating disease-mutation relationship extraction from biomedical literature.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2016Article
- Using Nonexperts for Annotating Pharmacokinetic Drug-Drug Interaction Mentions in Product Labeling: A Feasibility Study.JMIR research protocols · 2016Article
- Weakly supervised learning of biomedical information extraction from curated data.BMC bioinformatics · 2016Article
- BRONCO: Biomedical entity Relation ONcology COrpus for extracting gene-variant-disease-drug relations.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis article describes capture of biological information using a hybrid approach that combines natural language processing to extract biological entities and crowdsourcing with annotators recruited via Amazon Mechanical Turk to judge correctness of candidate biological relations. These techniques were applied to extract gene- mutation relations from biomedical abstracts with the goal of supporting production scale capture of gene-mutation-disease findings as an open source resource for personalized medicine.
resultsThe hybrid system could be configured to provide good performance for gene-mutation extraction (precision ∼82%; recall ∼70% against an expert-generated gold standard) at a cost of $0.76 per abstract. This demonstrates that crowd labor platforms such as Amazon Mechanical Turk can be used to recruit quality annotators, even in an application requiring subject matter expertise; aggregated Turker judgments for gene-mutation relations exceeded 90% accuracy. Over half of the precision errors were due to mismatches against the gold standard hidden from annotator view (e.g., incorrect EntrezGene identifier or incorrect mutation position extracted), or incomplete task instructions (e.g., the need to exclude nonhuman mutations).
conclusionsThe hybrid curation model provides a readily scalable cost-effective approach to curation, particularly if coupled with expert human review to filter precision errors. We plan to generalize the framework and make it available as open source software. DATABASE URL: http://www.mitre.org/publications/technical-papers/hybrid-curation-of-gene-mutation-relations-combining-automated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.