Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25246297›Full record

ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2015

How well can levator ani muscle morphology on 3D pelvic floor ultrasound predict the levator ani muscle function?

G Rostaminia, J D Peck, L H Quiroz, S A Shobeiri

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International urogynecology journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The levator ani muscle repair: a call to action.Techniques in coloproctology · 2021
    Article
  7. Three-Dimensional Transperineal Ultrasonography for Diagnosis of Female Occult Stress Urinary Incontinence.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Automatic segmentation of puborectalis muscle on three-dimensional transperineal ultrasound.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

G RostaminiaSection of Female Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, 920 Stanton L. Young Boulevard, WP2410, P.O. Box 26901, Oklahoma City, OK, 73190, USA.
J D Peck
L H Quiroz
S A Shobeiri
University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center · US

Funding

Tracking and Evaluation CoreU54GM104938 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA HLTH SCIENCES CTR · PI Robert Hal Scofield · 2013 to 2026
$68.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS 1 U54 GM104938-01A1NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM104938
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisThe aim of our study was to assess the performance of levator ani muscle deficiency (LAD) evaluated by 3D endovaginal ultrasound (EVUS) to detect pelvic floor muscle function as assessed by digital examination.

methodsThis cross-sectional study was conducted among 77 patients referred to our urogynecology clinic for pelvic floor dysfunction symptoms. Patients underwent physical examinations including digital pelvic muscle strength assessment using the Modified Oxford scale (MOS). EVUS volumes were evaluated and levator ani muscles were scored according to a validated LAD scoring system. MOS scores were categorized as nonfunctional (scores 0-1) and functional (scores 2-5).

resultsMean age of participants was 56 (SD ± 12.5) and 71% were menopausal. Overall, 32.5% had nonfunctional muscle strength and 44.2% were classified as having significant LAD. LAD identified by ultrasound had a sensitivity of 60% (95% CI 41 -79%) for detecting nonfunctional muscle and a specificity of 63% (95% CI 50 -77%) for detecting functional muscle. Overall, LAD demonstrated fair ability to discriminate between patients with and those without poor muscle function (area under the ROC curve = 0.70 [95% CI 0.58-0.83]). Among patients with an LAD score of 16-18, representing almost total muscle avulsion, 70% had nonfunctional MOS scores, whereas in patients with normal/minimal LAD (scores of 0-4), 89.5% had functional MOS scores.

conclusionsLevator ani deficiency and MOS scales were moderately negatively correlated. Among patients with normal morphology or the most severe muscle deficiency, LAD scores can identify the majority of patients with functional or nonfunctional MOS scores respectively.

Indexed as

Imaging, Three-DimensionalAdultAgedArea Under CurveCross-Sectional StudiesEndosonographyFemaleHumansMiddle AgedMuscle StrengthPelvic FloorPelvic Floor DisordersPhysical ExaminationROC Curve

Identifiers

PMID25246297
PMCPMC4874572
OpenAlexW2022232372

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.