Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25246175›Full record

ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2016

Radiographic sclerotic contour loss in the identification of glenoid bone loss.

Troy D Bornes, Jacob L Jaremko, Lauren A Beaupre, Martin J Bouliane

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 91% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. [Current concepts of diagnostic techniques and measurement methods for bone defect in patient with anterior shoulder instability].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Troy D BornesDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Alberta, 6-110B Clinical Sciences Building, 8440-112 Street NW, Edmonton, AB, T6G-2B7, Canada.
Jacob L JaremkoDepartment of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, University of Alberta, 2A2.41 Walter Mackenzie Centre, 8440-112 Street NW, Edmonton, AB, T6G-2B7, Canada.
Lauren A BeaupreDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Alberta, 6-110B Clinical Sciences Building, 8440-112 Street NW, Edmonton, AB, T6G-2B7, Canada.
Martin J BoulianeDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Alberta, 6-110B Clinical Sciences Building, 8440-112 Street NW, Edmonton, AB, T6G-2B7, Canada. bouliane@me.com.
University of Alberta · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeQuantification of glenoid bone loss guides surgical management in the setting of anterior shoulder instability. Glenoid defects resulting in ≥20 % articular area loss require bony reconstruction. The objective of this study was to evaluate the utility of sclerotic glenoid contour loss on true anteroposterior radiography in the detection of varying quantities of simulated glenoid bone loss using a cadaveric model.

methodsEight cadaveric scapulae with full radiographic sclerotic contour were osteotomized to produce glenoid surface area reductions of 10-50 %. Radiography was performed initially and following each osteotomy, and assessed by an orthopedic surgeon and radiologist twice. Quantity of glenoid loss was compared using Fisher's exact test. Sensitivity, specificity, and reliability analyses were performed.

resultsOn the first radiographic review, sclerotic contour loss was detected in 6 out of 8 scapulae with 50 % area loss, but only 1 out of 8 scapulae with 20 % area loss. There was a significantly higher proportion of radiographs containing sclerotic contour loss for defects with 50 % area loss compared to those with 0-25 % loss (p ≤ 0.02). In the detection of ≥20 % area loss, sclerotic contour loss had a sensitivity of 33-43 % and specificity of 88-100 %. Moderate inter-observer reliability (Cohen's kappa value of 0.42-0.53) and intra-observer reliability (kappa value of 0.46-0.58) were found.

conclusionRadiographic sclerotic contour loss is commonly observed in radiographs of scapulae with 40-50 % glenoid area loss and less often with smaller lesions. However, this finding lacks utility in discerning specific quantifications of glenoid bone loss. In a clinical setting, sclerotic contour loss suggests the presence of a large glenoid defect that may require bony reconstruction. However, an intact sclerotic contour does not rule out significant bone loss.

Indexed as

Aged, 80 and overBone ResorptionCadaverGlenoid CavityHumansJoint InstabilityMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsShoulder DislocationGlenohumeral instabilityGlenoid bone lossRadiographySclerotic contour loss

Identifiers

PMID25246175
OpenAlexW2006961089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.