ReviewNature reviews. Cardiology2014
Exploring unknowns in cardiology.
Review in Nature reviews. Cardiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- The impact of anti-gout medications on eight cardiovascular diseases: a Mendelian randomized study.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Article
- Macrophage profiling in atherosclerosis: understanding the unstable plaque.Basic research in cardiology · 2024Review
- Brain, heart, and sudden death.Current journal of neurology · 2022Review
- Genetics of inherited cardiomyopathies in Africa.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2020Review
- Resistin and prooxidant-antioxidant balance: Markers to discriminate acute coronary syndrome from stable angina.ARYA atherosclerosis · 2020Article
- Cardiovascular events, diabetes and guidelines: the virtue of simplicity.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2019Review
- Cardiovascular disease and cancer: Evidence for shared disease pathways and pharmacologic prevention.Atherosclerosis · 2017Review
- Association of serum microRNA-21 levels with Visfatin, inflammation, and acute coronary syndromes.Heart and vessels · 2017Article
- Sucrose Nonfermenting-Related Kinase Enzyme-Mediated Rho-Associated Kinase Signaling is Responsible for Cardiac Function.Circulation. Cardiovascular genetics · 2016Article
- Contributions of risk factors and medical care to cardiovascular mortality trends.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To mark the 10th anniversary of Nature Reviews Cardiology in November 2014, five of our Advisory Board members were invited to consider a topic within cardiology about which we know too little. A diverse range of subjects are highlighted in this Perspectives article, including preoperative assessment of right ventricular function, the burden of cardiomyopathies in Africa, the measurement of fractional flow reserve to guide coronary intervention, the interaction between genes and environment in cardiovascular disease, and the difficulty of predicting atherosclerotic plaque rupture. The five key opinion leaders from around the globe also suggest ways in which future research could be targeted to address the deficits in our understanding, with the aim of preventing cardiovascular disease, improving patient care, and reducing morbidity and mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.