Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25245287›Full record

ArticleCurrent treatment options in gastroenterology2014

Management of gastroparesis: beyond basics.

Jan Tack, Christophe Vanormelingen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current treatment options in gastroenterology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jan TackTranslational Research Center for Gastrointestinal Disorders, University of Leuven, 49 Herestraat, 3000, Leuven, Belgium, jan.tack@med.kuleuven.be.
Christophe Vanormelingen
KU Leuven · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

opinion statementGastroparesis is defined as the presence of delayed gastric emptying in the absence of mechanical obstruction, with a variety of upper gastrointestinal symptoms. Although measurement of gastric emptying is necessary for the diagnostic labeling, this finding has little impact in terms of explaining the symptom pattern and determining the prognosis and therapeutic approach. Clinical management is based on ruling out of mechanical causes and serum electrolyte imbalances, followed by initial medical treatment with a gastroprokinetic agent in most cases. However, the evidence that these drugs provide substantial symptomatic benefit is weak. Recent attempts to establish efficacy with newer prokinetics, including serotonin-4, motilin, and ghrelin receptor agonists, have seen few successes, but a new group of agents is under evaluation. More recently, also, no benefit was found with treatment with a tricyclic antidepressant in idiopathic gastroparesis. In refractory cases, especially when there is weight loss, invasive therapeutics such as insertion of feeding tubes, intrapyloric injection of botulinum toxin, implantable gastric electrical stimulation, or surgical (partial) gastrectomy are occasionally considered, but there is little evidence of efficacy, and these are not devoid of potentially major complications. Gastroparesis is likely to remain a challenging condition in the clinic in the foreseeable future.

Identifiers

PMID25245287
OpenAlexW1979892154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.