Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25245253›Full record

ArticleJPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition2014

Costs of multidisciplinary parenteral nutrition care provided at a distance via mobile tablets.

Heejung Kim, Ryan Spaulding, Marilyn Werkowitch, Donna Yadrich, Ubolrat Piamjariyakul, Richard Gilroy, Carol E Smith

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Heejung KimUniversity of Kansas School of Nursing, Kansas City, Kansas hkim2@kumc.edu.
Ryan SpauldingUniversity of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, Kansas.
Marilyn WerkowitchUniversity of Kansas School of Nursing, Kansas City, Kansas.
Donna YadrichUniversity of Kansas School of Nursing, Kansas City, Kansas.
Ubolrat PiamjariyakulUniversity of Kansas School of Nursing, Kansas City, Kansas.
Richard GilroyUniversity of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, Kansas.
Carol E SmithUniversity of Kansas School of Nursing and Preventive Medicine & Public Health, Kansas City, Kansas.
University of Kansas · US

Funding

Heartland Institute for Clinical and Translational ResearchUL1TR000001 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI BAROHN, RICHARD J. · 2012 to 2015
$13.0M
Mobile Technologies Assisting Patients & Family Caregivers in Healthy LivingR01EB015911 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI SMITH, CAROL E · 2013 to 2015
$1.7M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR000001NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB015911
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDetermining the costs of healthcare delivery is a key step for providing efficient nutrition-based care. This analysis tabulates the costs of delivering home parenteral nutrition (HPN) interventions and clinical assessments through encrypted mobile technologies to increase patients' access to healthcare providers, reduce their travel expenses, and allow early detection of infection and other complications.

methodsA traditional cost-accounting method was used to tabulate all expenses related to mobile distance HPN clinic appointments, including (1) personnel time of multidisciplinary healthcare professionals, (2) supply of HPN intervention materials, and (3) equipment, connection, and delivery expenses.

resultsA total of 20 mobile distance clinic appointments were conducted for an average of 56 minutes each with 45 patients who required HPN infusion care. The initial setup costs included mobile tablet devices, 4G data plans, and personnel's time as well as intervention materials. The initial costs were on average $916.64 per patient, while the follow-up clinic appointments required $361.63 a month, with these costs continuing to decline as the equipment was used by multiple patients more frequently over time. Patients reported high levels of satisfaction with cost savings in travel expenses and rated the quality of care comparable to traditional in-person examinations.

conclusionThis study provides important aspects of the initial cost tabulation for visual assessment for HPN appointments. These findings will be used to generate a decision algorithm for scheduling mobile distance clinic appointments intermittent with in-person visits to determine how to lower costs of nutrition assessments. To maximize the cost benefits, clinical trials must continue to collect clinical outcomes.

Indexed as

Health Care CostsHealth ExpendituresComputersCost-Benefit AnalysisHealth ResourcesHumansParenteral Nutrition, HomeParenteral Nutrition, TotalPatient SatisfactionQuality of Health CareTabletsTelemedicineTravelTabletshome nutrition supportnutritionnutrition support practiceoutcomes research/qualityparenteral nutritionreimbursement

Identifiers

PMID25245253
PMCPMC4231785
OpenAlexW2032614077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.