Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25245052›Full record

Trial reportJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2015

Final results of a phase II trial for stereotactic body radiation therapy for patients with inoperable liver metastases from colorectal cancer.

Marta Scorsetti, Tiziana Comito, Angelo Tozzi, Pierina Navarria, Antonella Fogliata, Elena Clerici, Pietro Mancosu, Giacomo Reggiori, Lorenza Rimassa, Guido Torzilli and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 75 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
75citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

75 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 167 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Letter to the editor regarding 'SBRT‑SG‑01: final results of a prospective multicenter study on stereotactic body radiotherapy for liver metastases'.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Marta ScorsettiRadiotherapy and Radiosurgery, Oncology, Liver Surgery Departments, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, Milano, Italy, marta.scorsetti@humanitas.it.
Tiziana Comito
Angelo Tozzi
Pierina Navarria
Antonella Fogliata
Elena Clerici
Pietro Mancosu
Giacomo Reggiori
Lorenza Rimassa
Guido Torzilli
Stefano Tomatis
Armando Santoro
Luca Cozzi
Humanitas University · ITInstitute of Oncology Research · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in the treatment of colorectal liver metastases.

methodsForty-two patients with inoperable colorectal liver metastases not amenable to radiofrequency ablation (RFA) were treated with SBRT for a total number of 52 lesions. All patients received a total dose of 75 Gy in 3 consecutive fractions. Mean size of the lesions was 3.5 cm (range 1.1-5.4). Toxicity was classified according to the Common Toxicity Criteria version 3.0.

resultsMedian follow-up was 24 (range 4-47) months. The progression in field was observed in 5 lesions. Twenty-four months actuarial local control (LC) rate was 91 %. Median overall survival (OS) was 29.2 ± 3.7 months. Actuarial OS rate at 24 months was 65 %. Median progression-free survival was 12.0 ± 4.2 months; 24 months actuarial rate was 35 %. No patients experienced radiation-induced liver disease or grade ≥3 toxicity.

conclusionsSBRT represents a feasible alternative for the treatment of colorectal liver metastases not amenable to surgery or other ablative treatments in selected patients, showing optimal LC and promising survival rate.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overColorectal NeoplasmsDose-Response Relationship, RadiationFeasibility StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLiver NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPrognosisProspective StudiesRadiosurgery

Identifiers

PMID25245052
PMCPMC11824129
OpenAlexW2055407227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.