Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25244618›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Impact of age and gender on the prevalence and prognostic importance of the metabolic syndrome and its components in Europeans. The MORGAM Prospective Cohort Project.

Julie K K Vishram, Anders Borglykke, Anne H Andreasen, Jørgen Jeppesen, Hans Ibsen, Torben Jørgensen, Luigi Palmieri, Simona Giampaoli, Chiara Donfrancesco, Frank Kee and 14 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 79 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
79citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
9.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

79 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 167 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Metabolic syndrome.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

19 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 15 institutions in 8 countries.

Julie K K VishramDepartment of Internal Medicine, Glostrup Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Glostrup, Denmark; Research Centre for Prevention and Health, Glostrup Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Glostrup, Denmark.
Anders BorglykkeResearch Centre for Prevention and Health, Glostrup Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Glostrup, Denmark.
Anne H AndreasenResearch Centre for Prevention and Health, Glostrup Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Glostrup, Denmark.
Jørgen JeppesenDepartment of Internal Medicine, Glostrup Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Glostrup, Denmark.
Hans IbsenDivision of Cardiology, Holbæk University Hospital, Holbæk, Denmark.
Torben JørgensenResearch Centre for Prevention and Health, Glostrup Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Glostrup, Denmark.
Luigi PalmieriCerebro and Cardiovascular Epidemiology Unit, National Centre of Epidemiology Surveillance and Health Promotion, National Institute of Health, Rome, Italy.
Simona GiampaoliCerebro and Cardiovascular Epidemiology Unit, National Centre of Epidemiology Surveillance and Health Promotion, National Institute of Health, Rome, Italy.
Chiara DonfrancescoCerebro and Cardiovascular Epidemiology Unit, National Centre of Epidemiology Surveillance and Health Promotion, National Institute of Health, Rome, Italy.
Frank KeeUKCRC Centre of Excellence for Public Health Research (NI), The Queen's University of Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland.
Giuseppe ManciaClinica Medica e Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Monza, Milano, Italy.
Giancarlo CesanaResearch Centre on Public Health, University of Milano Bicocca, Monza, Italy.
Kari KuulasmaaNational Institute for Health and Welfare (THL), Helsinki, Finland.
Veikko SalomaaNational Institute for Health and Welfare (THL), Helsinki, Finland.
Susana SansDepartment of Health, Barcelona, Spain.
Jean FerrieresDepartment of Cardiology, Toulouse University School of Medicine, Rangueil Hospital, Toulouse, France.
Jean DallongevilleInstitut Pasteur de Lille, Lille, France.
Stefan SöderbergDepartment of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Cardiology and Heart Centre, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Dominique ArveilerDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Strasbourg, Faculty of Medicine, Strasbourg, France.
Aline WagnerDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Strasbourg, Faculty of Medicine, Strasbourg, France.
Hugh Tunstall-PedoeCardiovascular Epidemiology Unit, University of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, United Kingdom.
Wojciech DrygasDepartment of Epidemiology, CVD Prevention and Health Promotion, National Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland.
Michael H OlsenDepartment of Endocrinology, Center of Individualized Medicine in Arterial Diseases (CIMA), Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark, and Hypertension in Africa Research Team (HART), North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa.
MORGAM Project
National Centre for Disease Prevention and Control · ITUniversity of Copenhagen · DKFinnish Institute for Health and Welfare · FIGlostrup Hospital · DKUniversité de Strasbourg · FRHolbæk Sygehus · DKHôpital Rangueil · FRInstitute of Cardiology · PLInstitut Pasteur de Lille · FRIRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano · ITNinewells Hospital · GBNorth-West University · ZAQueen's University Belfast · GBUmeå University · SEUniversity of Milano-Bicocca · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate the influence of age and gender on the prevalence and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk in Europeans presenting with the Metabolic Syndrome (MetS).

methodsUsing 36 cohorts from the MORGAM-Project with baseline between 1982-1997, 69094 men and women aged 19-78 years, without known CVD, were included. During 12.2 years of follow-up, 3.7%/2.1% of men/women died due to CVD. The corresponding percentages for fatal and nonfatal coronary heart disease (CHD) and stroke were 8.3/3.8 and 3.1/2.5.

resultsThe prevalence of MetS, according to modified definitions of the International Diabetes Federation (IDF) and the revised National Cholesterol Education Program-Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP-ATPIII), increased across age groups for both genders (P<0.0001); with a 5-fold increase in women from ages 19-39 years to 60-78 years (7.4%/7.6% to 35.4%/37.6% for IDF/NCEP-ATPIII) and a 2-fold increase in men (5.3%/10.5% to 11.5%/21.8%). Using multivariate-adjusted Cox regressions, the associations between MetS and all three CVD events were significant (P<0.0001). For IDF/NCEP-ATPIII in men and women, hazard ratio (HR) for CHD was 1.60/1.62 and 1.93/2.03, for CVD mortality 1.73/1.65 and 1.77/2.06, and for stroke 1.51/1.53 and 1.58/1.77. Whereas in men the HRs for CVD events were independent of age (MetS*age, P>0.05), in women the HRs for CHD declined with age (HRs 3.23/3.98 to 1.55/1.56; MetS*age, P=0.01/P=0.001 for IDF/NCEP-ATPIII) while the HRs for stroke tended to increase (HRs 1.31/1.25 to 1.55/1.83; MetS*age, P>0.05).

conclusionIn Europeans, both age and gender influenced the prevalence of MetS and its prognostic significance. The present results emphasise the importance of being critical of MetS in its current form as a marker of CVD especially in women, and advocate for a redefinition of MetS taking into account age especially in women.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAge FactorsCardiovascular DiseasesCohort StudiesEuropeFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMetabolic SyndromeMiddle AgedPrevalencePrognosisProspective StudiesRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID25244618
PMCPMC4171109
OpenAlexW2025350730

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.