Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25243851›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Investigation of 6-[¹⁸F]-fluoromaltose as a novel PET tracer for imaging bacterial infection.

Gayatri Gowrishankar, Mohammad Namavari, Erwan Benjamin Jouannot, Aileen Hoehne, Robert Reeves, Jonathan Hardy, Sanjiv Sam Gambhir

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Novel Diagnostic Methods for Infective Endocarditis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Chemoenzymatic Syntheses of Fluorine-18-Labeled Disaccharides from [Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Fluorinated carbohydrates forChemical Society reviews · 2023
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Gayatri GowrishankarDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, United States of America.
Mohammad NamavariDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, United States of America.
Erwan Benjamin JouannotSanofi R&D, Sanofi, Paris, France.
Aileen HoehneDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, United States of America.
Robert ReevesDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, United States of America.
Jonathan HardyDepartment of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, United States of America.
Sanjiv Sam GambhirDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, United States of America; Department of Bioengineering, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledDespite advances in the field of nuclear medicine, the imaging of bacterial infections has remained a challenge. The existing reagents suffer from poor sensitivity and specificity. In this study we investigate the potential of a novel PET (positron emission tomography) tracer that overcomes these limitations.

methods6-[¹⁸F]-fluoromaltose was synthesized. Its behavior in vitro was evaluated in bacterial and mammalian cultures. Detailed pharmacokinetic and biodistribution profiles for the tracer were obtained from a murine model.

results6-[¹⁸F]-fluoromaltose is taken up by multiple strains of pathogenic bacteria. It is not taken up by mammalian cancer cell lines. 6-[¹⁸F]-fluoromaltose is retained in infected muscles in a murine model of bacterial myositis. It does not accumulate in inflamed tissue.

conclusionWe have shown that 6-[¹⁸F]-fluoromaltose can be used to image bacterial infection in vivo with high specificity. We believe that this class of agents will have a significant impact on the clinical management of patients.

Indexed as

Positron-Emission TomographyAnimalsBacterial InfectionsFluorine RadioisotopesMaltoseMiceMice, NudeRadiopharmaceuticalsFluorine RadioisotopesMaltoseRadiopharmaceuticals

Identifiers

PMID25243851
PMCPMC4171493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.