ReviewPLoS medicine2014
Equity-oriented monitoring in the context of universal health coverage.
Review in PLoS medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
72 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Underserved groups could be better considered within population-based eye health surveys: a methodological study.Journal of clinical epidemiology · 2024Pooled it
- Interventions to improve access to cataract surgical services and their impact on equity in low- and middle-income countries.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- An assessment of the impact of pharmacogenomics on health disparities: a systematic literature review.Pharmacogenomics · 2017Pooled it
- Domiciliary dental care coverage in Taiwan: An assessment of provider participation and geographic distribution using the universal health coverage framework.Journal of dental sciences · 2026Article
- Persistent socioeconomic and ethnic inequalities in unmet need for NCD diagnosis and treatment in Viet Nam, 2015-2021.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
- Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation for health systems.Health policy and planning · 2024Article
- Pakistan's path to universal health coverage: national and regional insights.International journal for equity in health · 2024Article
- Unmet Medication Needs and the Association with Mortality in Older Adults: Equality-Oriented Monitoring toward Universal Health Coverage.Aging and disease · 2024Article
- Rural-urban inequalities in health care utilization in Bhutan: a decomposition analysis.International journal for equity in health · 2024Article
- Article
- Trends and socioeconomic inequalities in receiving vitamin A supplementation among children aged 6-59 months in Bangladesh: analysis of nationwide cross-sectional data from 2004 to 2017.BMJ nutrition, prevention & health · 2024Article
- Inequalities in utilization of maternal health services in Ethiopia: evidence from the PMA Ethiopia longitudinal survey.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Inequity of maternal-child health services in ASEAN member states from 1993 to 2021.International journal for equity in health · 2023Article
- Cataract services for all: Strategies for equitable access from a global modified Delphi process.PLOS global public health · 2023Article
- Inequities in birth registration, violent discipline, and child labour by disability status and sex: Evidence from the Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys in 24 countries.PLOS global public health · 2023Article
- Historic Redlining Practices and Contemporary Determinants of Health in the Detroit Metropolitan Area.American journal of public health · 2023Article
- Article
- Trends and Changes in Socio-Economic Inequality in Self-Rated Health among Migrants and Non-Migrants: Repeated Cross-Sectional Analysis of National Survey Data in Germany, 1995-2017.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Successes and challenges of health systems governance towards universal health coverage and global health security: a narrative review and synthesis of the literature.Health research policy and systems · 2022Review
- Findings from a scoping review.Journal of clinical epidemiology · 2022Article
12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Monitoring inequalities in health is fundamental to the equitable and progressive realization of universal health coverage (UHC). A successful approach to global inequality monitoring must be intuitive enough for widespread adoption, yet maintain technical credibility. This article discusses methodological considerations for equity-oriented monitoring of UHC, and proposes recommendations for monitoring and target setting. Inequality is multidimensional, such that the extent of inequality may vary considerably across different dimensions such as economic status, education, sex, and urban/rural residence. Hence, global monitoring should include complementary dimensions of inequality (such as economic status and urban/rural residence) as well as sex. For a given dimension of inequality, subgroups for monitoring must be formulated taking into consideration applicability of the criteria across countries and subgroup heterogeneity. For economic-related inequality, we recommend forming subgroups as quintiles, and for urban/rural inequality we recommend a binary categorization. Inequality spans populations, thus appropriate approaches to monitoring should be based on comparisons between two subgroups (gap approach) or across multiple subgroups (whole spectrum approach). When measuring inequality absolute and relative measures should be reported together, along with disaggregated data; inequality should be reported alongside the national average. We recommend targets based on proportional reductions in absolute inequality across populations. Building capacity for health inequality monitoring is timely, relevant, and important. The development of high-quality health information systems, including data collection, analysis, interpretation, and reporting practices that are linked to review and evaluation cycles across health systems, will enable effective global and national health inequality monitoring. These actions will support equity-oriented progressive realization of UHC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.