ArticleTelemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association2014
Patterns of response to patient-centered decision support through a personal health record.
Article in Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Functions and Outcomes of Personal Health Records for Patients with Chronic Diseases: A Systematic Review.Perspectives in health information managemen · 2021Pooled it
- Conditions potentially sensitive to a personal health record (PHR) intervention, a systematic review.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2015Pooled it
- Using Health Information Technology to Foster Engagement: Patients' Experiences with an Active Patient Health Record.Health communication · 2017Trial
- Implementation of electronic signposting to interventions that prevent cancer: A realist review.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- Patient-Clinician Communication in the Appalachian Region: A Scoping Review.Journal of Appalachian health · 2025Article
- Tablet distribution to veterans: an opportunity to increase patient portal adoption and use.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2022Article
- Digital Health Interventions to Enhance Prevention in Primary Care: Scoping Review.JMIR medical informatics · 2022Article
- Patient Health Record Systems Scope and Functionalities: Literature Review and Future Directions.Journal of medical Internet research · 2017Review
- Shared decision-making using personal health record technology: a scoping review at the crossroads.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2017Article
- Patients learning to read their doctors' notes: the importance of reminders.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2016Article
- Patient Portals and Patient Engagement: A State of the Science Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOver 140 million people in the United States have at least one chronic medical condition, but they receive fewer than 60% of guideline-recommended services for these conditions. Increasing patients' involvement in their own care may improve the receipt of guideline-recommended services. We evaluated patients' patterns of responses to notifications regarding guideline-recommended services delivered through a personalized health record (PHR). MATERIALS AND
methodsWe enrolled 584 participants with high cardiovascular disease risk from 73 primary care practices into an active PHR in which they received patient-centered decision support-notifications delivered via a PHR regarding prevention gaps (i.e., unmet preventive healthcare or chronic disease monitoring). Participants with prevention gaps received up to three weekly messages regarding all services due within a 2-month time frame. These three-message cycles could repeat up to every 2 months for a new, or continuing, prevention gap.
resultsOf the 584 participants, 501 (86%) received at least one reminder. Approximately 61% of these participants accessed the PHR or received the care that triggered the message after the first message and 73% after the first two messages. In subsequent three-message cycles, we observed no change in the number of messages required prior to participants accessing the PHR or receiving recommended care (chi-squared = 12.4, p = 0.3). Of the 2,656 prevention gaps these participants had over 1 year, 1,539 (58%) were closed.
conclusionsIn this low-intensity intervention, participants accessed the PHR and received recommended care. Providing notification through the PHR allows patients to choose when they receive, and take action on, the message. Notifications can be provided to patients through a PHR without alert fatigue and may be an additional tool to help patients achieve better health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.