Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25242935›Full record

ArticleBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]2014

Phylogenetic grouping and pathotypic comparison of urine and fecal Escherichia coli isolates from children with urinary tract infection.

Masoumeh Navidinia, Shahin Najar Peerayeh, Fatemeh Fallah, Bita Bakhshi, Raheleh Sadat Sajadinia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology], 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Molecular characterization of ESBL-producingFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Characterization ofInfection and drug resistance · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Relationships between Virulence Factors and Antimicrobial Resistance amongOsong public health and research perspectives · 2018
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Antibiotic Resistance in Pediatric Urinary Tract Infections.Current infectious disease reports · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Masoumeh NavidiniaBacteriology Department Tarbiat Modarres University Tehran Iran Bacteriology Department, Tarbiat Modarres University, Tehran, Iran.
Shahin Najar PeerayehBacteriology Department Tarbiat Modarres University Tehran Iran Bacteriology Department, Tarbiat Modarres University, Tehran, Iran.
Fatemeh FallahPediatric Infection Research Center Mofid Childrens' Hospital Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran Pediatric Infection Research Center, Mofid Childrens' Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Bita BakhshiBacteriology Department Tarbiat Modarres University Tehran Iran Bacteriology Department, Tarbiat Modarres University, Tehran, Iran.
Raheleh Sadat SajadiniaShahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the phylogenetic background and to assess hlyD (involved in the secretion of haemolysin A) and intI1 (encoding a class 1 integrase) in Escherichia coli isolates derived from urinary and fecal specimens. A total of 200 E. coli isolates was collected from patients presenting with urinary tract infection (UTI) during September 2009 to September 2010 and screened for hlyD and intI1 genes by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Phylogenetic analysis showed that E. coli is composed of four main phylogenetic groups (A, B1, B2 and D) and that uropathogenic E. coli (UPEC) isolates mainly belong to groups B2 (54%) and D (34%) whereas group A (44%) and D (26%) are predominant among commensal E. coli isolates. In this study, hlyD was present in 26% of UPEC and 2% of commensal E. coli isolates. However, hemolytic activity was detected for 42% of UPEC and 6% of commensal E. coli isolates (p < 0.05). intI1 gene was more frequently expressed in UPEC (24%) in comparison with commensal E. coli isolates (12%). Resistance to aztreonam, co-trimoxazole and cefpodoxime were frequently found among UPEC isolates whereas commensal E. coli isolates were commonly resistant to co-trimoxazole, nalidixic acid and cefotaxime. Concluding, a considerable difference between UPEC and commensal E. coli isolates was observed regarding their phylogenetic groups, presence of class 1 integron and hlyD gene, hemolysin activity and resistance pattern. The detection of class 1 integrons and hlyD gene was higher among UPEC compared with commensal E. coli isolates. These findings may contribute for a better understanding of the factors involved in the pathogenesis of UPEC.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationPhylogenyAnti-Bacterial AgentsChildChild, PreschoolCluster AnalysisDrug Resistance, BacterialEscherichia coliEscherichia coli InfectionsEscherichia coli ProteinsFecesFemaleGenotypeHemolysin ProteinsHumansIntegrasesAnti-Bacterial AgentsEscherichia coli ProteinsHemolysin ProteinsHlyD protein, E coliIntegrasesintegron integrase IntI1Membrane Transport ProteinsEscherichia colihlyDintI1phylogenetic typing groupsurinary tract infection (UTI)

Identifiers

PMID25242935
PMCPMC4166276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.