Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25242825›Full record

ArticleLearning and motivation2014

What-Where-When Memory in the Rodent Odor Span Task.

Carrie L Branch, Mark Galizio, Katherine Bruce

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Learning and motivation, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Rats replay episodic memories in context.Current biology : CB · 2026
    Article
  2. Male and female impairments in odor span are observed in a rat model of PTSD.Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.) · 2023
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Generalizing from the Past, Choosing the Future.Perspectives on behavior science · 2020
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Carrie L BranchUniversity of North Carolina Wilmington, 601 S. College St., Wilmington, NC 28403.
Mark GalizioUniversity of North Carolina Wilmington, 601 S. College St., Wilmington, NC 28403.
Katherine BruceUniversity of North Carolina Wilmington, 601 S. College St., Wilmington, NC 28403.
University of North Carolina Wilmington · US

Funding

Drugs of Abuse and Memory SpanR15DA029252 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA WILMINGTON · PI GALIZIO, JOSEPH MARK · 2010 to 2016
$682k
NIDA NIH HHS R15 DA029252
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While the Odor Span Task (OST) was developed to assess working memory in rodents, it appears that odor ("What") and time since an odor was last reinforced ("When") jointly control responding in the OST. The OST uses an incrementing non-match to sample procedure such that the number of stimuli to remember increases during the session; the rodent is trained to remember stimuli within a session but not between sessions. We used a variation of the OST to add a "Where" dimension to the task to examine whether rodents could learn to respond to scents based on contextual cues as well. In Experiment 1, 6 rats well-trained on the OST procedure were exposed to four target scents in a holding cage before the OST session began [What-Where-When (WWW) condition]. When these target scents appeared in the OST, rats treated them as novel scents despite their being previously encountered that day; WWW responding was comparable to baseline (BL) responding. Controls were implemented to account for relative familiarity: frequency of target presentation and time since the target odor was presented. On both types of control probes, rats typically responded to target scents less than during WWW or BL conditions, took longer to make a response, and visited more comparison stimuli. In Experiment 2, the study was replicated adding reinforcement delivery for responding to pre-session presentation of target stimuli. Subjects were the same 6 rats plus 2 additional rats also well-trained on the OST. Results were similar to those from Experiment 1. These data indicate that the variables controlling performance on the OST task include

Indexed as

episodic-like memoryOdor Span Taskolfactory scentsrats

Identifiers

PMID25242825
PMCPMC4167358
OpenAlexW2119311283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.