Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25242480›Full record

ReviewNature chemistry2014

Contemporary screening approaches to reaction discovery and development.

Karl D Collins, Tobias Gensch, Frank Glorius

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature chemistry, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. A General Group Testing Strategy for Discovering Chemical Cooperativity.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2026
    Article
  3. Advancing Organic Chemistry Using High-Throughput Experimentation.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Digitizing chemical discovery with a Bayesian explorer for interpreting reactivity data.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  17. Machine-Learning-Guided Discovery of Electrochemical Reactions.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2022
    Article
  18. Iminologous epoxide ring-closure.Chemical science · 2022
    Article
  19. High-Throughput Platform for Novel Reaction Discovery.Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2022
    Article
  20. Review

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Karl D CollinsOrganisch-Chemisches Institut, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Corrensstrasse 40, 48149 Münster, Germany.
Tobias GenschOrganisch-Chemisches Institut, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Corrensstrasse 40, 48149 Münster, Germany.
Frank GloriusOrganisch-Chemisches Institut, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Corrensstrasse 40, 48149 Münster, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

New organic reactivity has often been discovered by happenstance. Several recent research efforts have attempted to leverage this to discover new reactions. In this Review, we attempt to unify reported approaches to reaction discovery on the basis of the practical and strategic principles applied. We concentrate on approaches to reaction discovery as opposed to reaction development, though conceptually groundbreaking approaches to identifying efficient catalyst systems are also considered. Finally, we provide a critical overview of the utility and application of the reported methods from the perspective of a synthetic chemist, and consider the future of high-throughput screening in reaction discovery.

Indexed as

CatalysisCombinatorial Chemistry TechniquesCycloaddition ReactionDNAHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysImmunoassayOrganic ChemicalsPharmaceutical PreparationsSolid-Phase Synthesis TechniquesSubstrate SpecificityDNAOrganic ChemicalsPharmaceutical Preparations

Identifiers

PMID25242480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.